Jump to content
  1. Forum News & Rules

    1. 14,374
      posts
    2. Wyrd Board Help and Code of Conduct

      Proper etiquette on using the Wyrd Miniatures forums as well as a place to discuss wants, wishes and suggestions for the website.

      4,656
      posts
    3. Community Events

      Share the time and place for all Demos, Tournaments, and Open Gaming Events.

      54,912
      posts
    4. Wyrd Events

      Wyrd events such as the Wyrd Painting Contests, the Iron Painter and a few other fun moments we try to sponsor here.

      2,150
      posts
  2. Discussions and Interests

    1. News, Reviews, & Discussion

      Talk, share, discuss or debate anything and everything that catches your interest.

      184,799
      posts
    2. 122,811
      posts
  3. Malifaux

    1. 174,166
      posts
    2. Malifaux Discussion

      New player or old, come here to discuss Malifaux!

      94,017
      posts
    3. Malifaux Rules Discussion

      Have a question or want clarification on the rules? This is the place.

      49,740
      posts
    4. 1,874
      posts
  4. Through the Breach

    1. 5,576
      posts
    2. Player Creations

      Share your adventures, Pursuits, equipment, etc here.

      663
      posts
  5. The Other Side

    1. 1,025
      posts
    2. 718
      posts
    3. The Other Side Rules Discussion

      Have a question or want clarification on the rules? This is the place.

      15
      posts
  6. Other Games

    1. 7,191
      posts
    2. 23
      posts
    •   
    Chatbox
    Load More
    You don't have permission to chat.
  • Posts

    • Yeah, I would try to keep them on the same number as much as possible, this was just to show off the "worst case" scenario for what it might look like.  
      Could certainly pair the old strategies in the same way.  Could also have a default list of just 13 that is the same for all of the old ones.  I haven't given much thought to how these new schemes synergize with the old strategies as much.  
    • Aw c'mon, you brought them into the Guild discussions in the first place as baselines for what you want out of hiring cost!   (Funny how I used to get all starry-eyed and jealous over Sparks, but now that I can do what he does I'm a lot less interested...)
    • Not against this. Hypothetically if we go down this route suggestions I would make: Try to keep the scheme on the same number as much as possible (so when I make my deck of cards I can keep them ordered for faster lookup) and add a column for Jokers.

      Random thought: GG18 will contain strats from GG16(?) for the section of Round v. Strategy by month. Can we pair the suits of those Strategies to "similar" GG18 Strategy suits so the same scheme table (if and/or whatever it happens to be) can be used? Thinking of those TOs who do not preplan schemes and use the monthly strategies that the GG18 doc suggests.   edit: Random thought #2: If we were do red/black schemes with red/black chosen by Strategy suit... there is a problem with Joker Strats.... Unless I use my brain and think of red/black Jokers
    • But, finally it's leaved to TO... It's written in a so wide and generic way that is more a general undefined intent definition that a rule itself. Sure no one can question about color of tokens, except if the opponent is affected by daltonism or acromatopsy. In that case it's right to give him the chances to understand the situation on the table as better as the other. Obviously, it is expected that this kind of player would bring appropriate marker to be used... Finally, what is written is simoly that you can't choose a tracking system completely ignoring the opponent. And I think this is right. If a player would choose marker of just slightly different shade of the same color, or writing in ancient aramaic, I can oppose this passage of the ruleset. In the previous writing, choosing a tracking system it was only self referential. Now you know you need to mediate with your opponent... TO have the final word in case of dispute, as always.
×