Jump to content

santaclaws01

Vote Enabled
  • Posts

    3,889
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

santaclaws01 last won the day on April 21

santaclaws01 had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

3,633 profile views

santaclaws01's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

1.6k

Reputation

1

Community Answers

  1. The dabbler can be engaged, but it can't engage any models. No, the dabbler is engaged. A model is engaged if it within the engagement range of any enemy model. Any model within 2"(and LoS) of Hungering Darkness will be engaged by the Hungering Darkness. However in the case of the Dabbler, the Hungering Darkness would not be engaged and thus could walk away or interact if it wanted to.
  2. Yes, abilities that are based on a models position on the board do not work while buried.
  3. It's a may effect, so talk does nothing if both schemes are revealed.
  4. It's been different with each release for various reasons, so it's anybody's guess.
  5. No, the rider just gains tokens each turn, and then can use those tokens to build in one per token spent when you're at the declare trigger timing step of a duel.
  6. Yes, a model can choose to activate and just take no actions.
  7. Nothing in the rules states that non-marker terrain is treated as a model, so definitely no.
  8. Only once, firstly because the only thing the gearling did that would proc hazardous is move, and secondly because a model can only suffer the effects of a piece of hazardous terrain once per action.
  9. Last bullet point in Markers "When drawing LoS to a Marker, the Marker is treated as a model with Size 0, unless the Marker has the Height Terrain Trait, in which case its Size is equal to its Height."
  10. For questions 1 and 2, All models that fail the duel for life of the earth would suffer the hazardous effects as it is the action doing those effects. If it does damage, an incorp model would reduce that by 1, but they would still gain whatever conditions if any it gives out. For question 3, when drawing los to a marker it is treated as a model so there is an argument that any attack action that targets a marker.
  11. @solkan Auras not being cumulative is saying auras of the same name do not stack, which you also quoted so I'm not sure how you missed that. This is two different auras both generating their own hazardous terrain that just happen to be centered on the same scheme marker. The Grave Goo FAQ is irrelevent here because it is not adding a hazardous trait to an existing piece of hazardous terrain, it's just creating a wholly different piece of hazardous terrain.
  12. 4.7 *Carve a Path – Can an enemy model use a Strategy Marker to remove a Marker that is under an effect that prevents enemy models from removing it, such as the Dependable or Rusted Metal Abilities? a) No. If an enemy model takes the Interact Action and is controlling the Push of the Strategy Marker, the removal of the non- Strategy Marker is considered an enemy effect.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information