eldritch

Do the stat cards released on the app count as 'officially released' with respect to the GG0 rules for proxying models?

The very fact that you have to demonstrate a different wording indicates that the meaning of the current wording is clear and needs no speculation to ascertain its meaning. One can equally speculate that the very presence of different wording implies that the intention was to differentiate its behavior from other characteristics, and this speculation would be no less valid than your speculation that the current wording was unintentional. Without further clarification, I would put forward that using the wording as it is written is the more reasonable path.

The problem isn't that they can't fight. The problem is that they're basically worthless on their own. Pandora already has an issue with the enemy not clumping up, and sure, Sorrows can work well when they're nicely positioned to support her, and that's the problem. You need stuff that can work elsewhere, independently and more flexibly - not things that aggravate her weakness. Putting Barbaros in the mix compounds the problem further.

Don't use Sorrows or Madness against Arcanists. In fact, Pandora can be run as or more effectively without the crap that comes in her box. Hans and a Doppleganger with Retribution's Eye will handle armor, and Voices Pandora will end the RG - well, paralyze it at your leisure anyway.

You can also consider getting the PDF versions of the books from drivethrurpg, for easier transport, access to the fluff and stats for other models. I regret getting the print versions myself, haha! The word search feature is pretty awesome.

McTavish and Changelings.

You are severely miscalculating the potential and effect of Mysterious. The push effect does so much more than Shadow's ability in most cases, for one. Shadow's ability can only affect a single AP from a single model, if it even succeeds, whereas pushing in reaction to a charge, or even the first attack of an already engaged model cancels at least one, if not more of the enemy's APs. If the leader is engaged by multiple models from the previous turn, and especially if said leader has a melee range of 3, pushing it might result in the effective loss of 3+ enemy APs, if you're then out of their range, but they're still in yours. It breaks charges, flurries, second attack triggers and can cause the loss of melee expert AP, among other things. Outside of simply cancelling enemy AP in combat, the condition can be used simply to add 3" to the leader's movement, to enable a charge or put them in range, or it can be used to slide out of sight or into cover you couldn't otherwise reach, again potentially cancelling multiple enemy AP. If you can't think of how 3" of reactive movement can be used to great effect, you're really not thinking hard enough. I certainly wouldn't trade our effigy for any other.

Per the title, would Anathema make a model immune to all conditions vulnerable to Paralyse specifically?

I saw the 1e full page art of Nekima and knew I wanted her in my crew, so shopped around around for the best Master to go with her - I ended up with Zoraida. Come 2e, I wasn't impressed by the changes to Z, so shopped around for a better choice, while keeping a spot for Nekima in the crew still, and decided on Pandora. Have not regretted it

2 player cooperative mode! 2 player pvpve!

It's not.

The Obeying player would also get to make and cheat Nino's flip for the WP duel, I believe.

A Silent One has Counterspell, btw. Makes it a pretty bad target for Alpha.

Could be problematic, as Mature Nephilim are Rare 2. Also, Blood Sense from BBS and Nekima will not work together.