A question was raised on facebook yesterday that seemed quite open to interpretation.
Basically a situation had arisen where Johan had been Hemmed by the Voodoo doll and the doll (and hence Johan) given Burning 5.
Now the Doll had 2 wounds left and Johan had 6 wounds left.
The argument was, does the burning happen to Johan first, taking him down to 1 wound and hence negating hard to kill, and then the Hem kills him. Or does the Hem hit first and then the burning meaning that Johan survives due to hard to kill?
The main point raised was that in the rule book it states that the sequence in which conditions are applied are down to the owner of the model. My point was that Hem is a reactive condition and requires the Burning to happen first meaning that it can't be applied before the burning.
Question
feagaur
A question was raised on facebook yesterday that seemed quite open to interpretation.
Basically a situation had arisen where Johan had been Hemmed by the Voodoo doll and the doll (and hence Johan) given Burning 5.
Now the Doll had 2 wounds left and Johan had 6 wounds left.
The argument was, does the burning happen to Johan first, taking him down to 1 wound and hence negating hard to kill, and then the Hem kills him. Or does the Hem hit first and then the burning meaning that Johan survives due to hard to kill?
The main point raised was that in the rule book it states that the sequence in which conditions are applied are down to the owner of the model. My point was that Hem is a reactive condition and requires the Burning to happen first meaning that it can't be applied before the burning.
What are peoples thoughts?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.