4thstringer Posted August 14, 2016 Report Share Posted August 14, 2016 The field reporters "assaulted in public" gives the assaulted +2 condition, which reads" when this model activates, suffer 2 damage and end this condition" I can't for the life of me understand the reason to have it be a stacking condition. Is it a typo from the original? Since it is +2 does it do 4 damage total(which would be bonkers for a 4 stone model, even with it being removable and delayed)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lusciousmccabe Posted August 14, 2016 Report Share Posted August 14, 2016 Is that an automatic trigger? Edit: Oh, I see what you're saying. It looks like there's a missing + before the second two. That actually would mean the condition stacks but always does 2 damage no matter how high it goes. I assume it's meant to be "suffer +2 damage" to correspond with the condition's +2, like for armor. Then it would be 1 damage per unit of condition. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludvig Posted August 14, 2016 Report Share Posted August 14, 2016 Sounds like a missprint to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncommon_Man Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 All of my cards, as well as the book have Assaulted +2, deal +2 damage ect. It reads the same as Burning but triggers on activation rather than end of turn. So yes, it would be 4 damage if you hit a the trigger twice. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucidicide Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 I have checked the book and the cards. They are +2 in both locations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wizuriel Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 The way I read it is that the condition stacks. When the reporters cast it you get 2 stacks of assaulted which is why you take 2 damage from it (so if they cast it twice you take 4 damage). probably should have said "when this model activates, suffer damage equal to the amount of assaulted stacks on this model" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lusciousmccabe Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 I think the plus essentially means that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagisman Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 On August 14, 2016 at 7:59 AM, 4thstringer said: The field reporters "assaulted in public" gives the assaulted +2 condition, which reads" when this model activates, suffer 2 damage and end this condition" I can't for the life of me understand the reason to have it be a stacking condition. Is it a typo from the original? Since it is +2 does it do 4 damage total(which would be bonkers for a 4 stone model, even with it being removable and delayed)? The reason for it is that 2 is min damage typically. It's worse than just being part of the attack action's damage because it's a condition and only Nellie can take credit for the kill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.