inbrain

Thank you both for your answers!

Should '"This or That" choices' section of the rulebook apply here, meaning that if opposing player already revealed both of his schemes, target model has to discard 2 cards? The reason I'm asking, as wording doesn't exactly match rulebook wording, as the "may" part of "TALK!" ability refers model while the "must" part refers opposing player.

thank you for replying, for some reason I perceived "declare charge" in charge section as something special compared to normal action sequence, while it's not.

Or if to rephrase: do you first "declare" charge and then "declare" you're using an attack out of it, or attack part is not a "declaration"?

Ok, problem solved, I suppose. I didn't realise if I join two sentence together it will be "between two closest points" which implies straight line. I was just a bit confused with absence of phrase "ignoring terrain" but I assume that can be unimportant considering more "global" nature of "closest distance"

I was always sure that when I'm measuring for this ability I can totally ignore say impassable buildings in between my and my opponent's model. Now after I re-read range/distance rules listed below I'm not sure anymore. Should I interpret rule excerpt bellow in application to Aerial Strike and similar abilities as: -- If there is building that is climable between me and model that has to be in range of my ability - I add vertical distance when attempting to measure range? -- If there is impassable building between us - I measure shortest path which won't be a straight line (as I won't be able to climb it or stand on it)?

oh, then what would be the answer to the first part? I implied it cause I don't see a reason to reply starting with the second one, as if the first one is false then second one 100% doesn't make sense

But just to be super clear: it was also indirect confirmation that the first item on my list is truthful ?

Ok, sorry, got the difference at last

But I specifically put example with Bring It - it also doesn't do damage, but according to what I read Slander trigger does damage, why should I treat them differently?

So, I have two questions related to this post title. * According to Wyrd Discord: Kentauroi Filthy Spear +1 damage on charge affects damage twice if Rear Up trigger is declared. So it will be two instances of damage one: 3/4/5 (from main action +1) and one 3 (from Rear Up 2 + 1). The justification as far as I can tell is based on FAQ entry that damage from triggers is also considered to be damage from actions (in attachment). I want to verify if this is correct line of thought * Provided the first item is true, does it also mean all other triggers lead to 0 + 1 additional damage from trigger (in addition to 2/3/4 + 1) for Kentauroi? The logic for me would be the same as Slander trigger for Bring It attack of Phiona Gage. While attack by itself deals no damage, trigger will steal deal damage assuming base damage is 0.

But what about my specific example with aura and marker?

Hi, I want to verify multiple non-marker (or mixed) sources of hazardous terrain interaction with each other I know there is excerpt that rules hazardous markers (the one I attached). But * Does it apply the same way to non-marker sources of hazardous terrain? (like marker + terrain or marker + Aura) * Does it also apply to damage the same way it applies to statuses? My confusion comes from the fact that Injured and other statuses from hazardous markers are always +X while damage doesn't have plus sign In other words if my model is within an aura generating hazardous terrain (1 damage) and standing on pit trap marker (1 damage 1 injured) will it suffer 2 damage +1 injured.. or something else if it makes an action

Thank you!

The title says it all. Territorial text included