Just a quick question to get everyone's opinion on this. Let us say that Seamus uses Live For Pain (or a Gremlin Dumb Lucks some damage) the model that is suffering damage uses a SS to prevent damage. This prevents the damage to 0. What would happen from the wording of Dumb Luck/Live For Pain/other actions which cause healing off of damage suffered by a model
a. DL does 4 damage Gremlin takes 2/LFP hits for 2 damage Seamus heals 2
b. DL/LFP does 4 damage all damage is prevented so nothing happens since the target didn't suffer any damage.
c. gremlin still takes 2/Seamus doesn't heal because target suffered 0 damage
I can see ti one of these 3 ways just curious how others are handling it, and wondering if it might need to be FAQed...
Question
rgarbonzo
Just a quick question to get everyone's opinion on this. Let us say that Seamus uses Live For Pain (or a Gremlin Dumb Lucks some damage) the model that is suffering damage uses a SS to prevent damage. This prevents the damage to 0. What would happen from the wording of Dumb Luck/Live For Pain/other actions which cause healing off of damage suffered by a model
a. DL does 4 damage Gremlin takes 2/LFP hits for 2 damage Seamus heals 2
b. DL/LFP does 4 damage all damage is prevented so nothing happens since the target didn't suffer any damage.
c. gremlin still takes 2/Seamus doesn't heal because target suffered 0 damage
I can see ti one of these 3 ways just curious how others are handling it, and wondering if it might need to be FAQed...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
25 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.