JemmyVonJude

Hi, I was just wondering, are the cards translated in french gone for good ? granted they hadn't been updated in a while, but they were a good help to start a french newbie in malifaux (and then tell 'em to learn better english haha) Maybe they are updating the batch before making those available again ? Maybe there's plans to make a real batch to buy translation packs straight off wargamevault ? (one could dream) Maybe waldo kidnapped 'em to hide in an egg this easter season ? Would love it if they were back tho, or if anyone could point me to a fansite that kept copies ?

Anyone got a heads up (email or something) that their Even wilder mini was sent yet ? Wouldn't want mine to get stuck in customs or anything 😅

Ah cheers, thanks for the advice, did that too then ^^ (are you supposed to get a confirmation mail or something after filling the form for the "wilder" variant ? I'm wondering if I did that correctly)

Any chance to see a similar promo coming to the webstore ? No luck finding a physical store that carries malifaux products in my corner of france

soooo, that means any focus tony uses for that defense also gives her a bonus flip to the damage of her defensive trigger, right ?

Played our first game with this mode, a few things appeared tho, using viktoria chambers crews : each master counting for 3 at the center is a bit too good when your master has a twin, and the scheme mentions having to choose different masters too... we think both would benefit from being tweaked. Like only leaders and not masters counting as 3 characters for center control, and having to pick from different players crews for your scheme (turns it less 2vs1 if players decide that nominating both victorias is easier) Also, shouldn't we tweak friendly fire when player A shoots a melee involving player B & C but not A ?

Ahhhh indeed, that's what I was looking for I figured declaring and taking the action were worded differently on purpose to bypass having to declare (hence bypassing the limitation in parker's case) but alas, seems that it doesn't indeed... damn ! Well, still won that specific game, but hey, was worth trying 😛

So, the only thing that confuses me in that is the way interact is worded, in the situation we had ingame, it was parker's turn, and he started engaged... his first action was to disengage, then he shoots someone and inflicts at least one damage - draw the attention states that a friendly model takes the interact action on a discard, and as he is himself in his own line of sight, can Barrow interact even if he disengaged this turn, since you can't declare interact if you disengaged, but he is an eligible model for that "take an interact action" part

I was under the same impression, I guess it would have said "has spent focus" otherwise

Faded mirror states has Know the warrior : AfterAfter this models cheats fate in an opposed duel with an enemy, if this model has Focused, it may draw a card after resolving the current action. Does that "has Focused" part refer to simply having the Focused (X) condition or does that require the model to have Focused on that specific duel ?

thanks a lot

Hi, I'm wondering about Fuhatsu's rules, his Hurricane punch can trigger Quick shot, which allows him to take a ranged attack even if he's engaged, but he also has an ability Rapid fire that allows him to take a ranged action again after resolving one. So, does the Rapid fire allow the second ranged to shoot even if engaged too if it's used on the quick shot trigger ?

Ok, so, it's meant to be subsequent for this model, got it

Hi, probably a stupid newbie question but I gotta ask since this text in the March 2020 errata confuses me even more. So, I wonder, if I play for instance Tony Ironsides, and that an opponent uses a generated attack that cannot declare triggers, does my defense declares triggers or does it also prevents it, as being subsequent ? In other words, can Tony use her trigger DF:Good shot, my turn on a generated attack ?

Hi, is it still available ?