GrAYFoX

Sure, Corvus Belli with Infinity. Personally I'm about options and would like: Paid faction decks (costs need to be covered). Plastic would be nice, but realistically to keep costs down (especially for players with many factions), sleeves or lamination would still be needed. Books for future models and expansions containing fluff, artwork, scenarios/missions and statcards. Those that enjoy the former and wish to further support Wyrd in this form can do so Statcards to be part of a mobile application like PP's War Room. Errata and updates to be automatically downloaded via this app. Service value here from other functions would offset the availability of below Free pdf downloads (a timed release after the books and app perhaps) for those that wish to print their own and more importantly , peruse the range to gauge future model purchases without the barrier of multiple $30+ books To touch on that last one. In my group many players sat on their box set with a blister or two gained from starting out master entries on the PMF wiki. It wasn't until I brought my books regularly to game days (own all 4) that they read all their faction statcards and subsequently purchased new minis. Secondly, the existing free pdfs are used to learn about other crews and kept them anchored in the system longer. I think there's a strong case to be made that it would lower the cost barrier of entry generating new players and increase the purchase rate of existing players. Of course this is all opinion based on opportunity gain. The tweets do sound promising though.

Are there any changes to the LoS rules? This is still a bugbear for new players from other systems in my meta. Are there any plans for full featured mobile software (errata updates, list creation, stat-cards etc.)? Are there any plans to offer the M2 stat-cards outside of the books/faction decks digitally, say as part of the above software or via pdf?

Perdita Ortega

Got mine today in Ausland. Very pleased with the quality. Great job across the board. :1_Happy_Puppet1:

Yeah, along with the stat-card art. I'll see what conversions I can do, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't disappointed.

Here's a few: Warcast Studios Black Cat Bases Trolls Den Terrain Partial: Secret Weapon Miniatures

Yep, under resolved issues: http://www.wyrd-games.net/showthread.php?33856-Resolved-Issues#3 Q. When a Spell targets a model and a number of additional models (for example, Suppressing Fire, Undead Psychosis) are the additional models required to Resist the Spell if the initial target succeeds in Resisting the Spell? A: No. If the initial target passes its Resist Duel the Spell ends before the other models are required to Resist.

Got my Wyrd Birthday Sale order in this morning (Melbourne). So they are probably starting to trickle through now. GL

Totally agree. I'm still holding out for the Levi Alternate Sculpt. Some of his core minions could do with alts as well

Here is the last ruling on the spell AFAIK: http://www.wyrd-games.net/showthread.php?24298-Avatar-Sonnia-Searing-Wave

If you don't order from Battlefoam directly and find a good local supplier, post back. As Toonook stated, shipping to AUS is brutal and the local suppliers I have used in the past take months to fulfill an order. Cheers

This was the last running list I believe: http://www.wyrd-games.net/showthread.php?27962-Manufacturers-of-Scenic-Bases

As mentioned above. I did a similar pin with this and this. GL

Ah...I see it now, thanks Ratty. Cool ability.

Rather than keep off-topic, I was hoping to continue the discussion around Opposed Willpower Duels (sparked off by Tanner's Pitiful ability) in this thread within the appropriate forum. As suggested in that thread, using the check-list for what constitutes an attack it was clearer to see which Opposed Willpower Duels (Wp->Wp) counted as attacks and which did not. For those that didn't (Pitiful and Expose Fears) the language was similarly worded in contrast to something like Pandora's Incite/Pacify which has things like "If the target model loses" etc. I think I have a solid understanding of how it works now, but one ability seems to skirt between the two cases. The Onryo's Haunt ability doesn't count as an attack as per the definition on RM, pg18 but it has language like "target model" and "if the target model loses." Add that you can select any model within 6" to receive the effects and it reads like an attack. My question is, is this ability a weird exception or is it just like Pitiful where there is no defender? Sorry for the heap of text and feel free to throw up other examples for discussion

The Effigy's are not totems and neither are the Waifs.

You must have an out of date card. The v2 card for Zoraida has "Target non-Master model" as the first sentence in Obey along with the Twisting Fates aZoraida book entry: http://www.wyrd-games.net/StatCards/Neverbornv2.pdf

Good to know. From the way Obey is written, I would have thought you were still in the first model's activation. Hence, the Obey limit had been reached even if it was an Obeyed minion (such as a non companioned Enslaved Nephalim) casting it (effectively 3 Obeys).

These stealth stat card changes to abilities are starting to grate. Our group ran into this when looking for the most up to date version of dispel magic (Witchling Handler). Perhaps a fourth PDF is needed to specifically track these; something like Talents and Spells updates PDF?

Here's the problem though. It all hinges on what "after damaging" now/still means. Previously, this meant the damage resolution process, so it would occur at step 6. in the errata damage process. In the FAQ "damage inflicted" is a specific phrase found on abilities like Seamus' Live for Pain. Notice that both are not using the keyword Damage (capital) or Dg.

Heh, I asked the same question yesterday in another topic here: http://www.wyrd-games.net/showthread.php?30829-Rectivate-and-override-edict/page2 I think the confusion comes up because Reactivate has it's own rules and the sentence is structured in a way that can be interpreted as an OR clause. A simple inclusion of "also" would fix that right up: "Activate target Construct after this model's activation ends. If the target Construct has activated previously this turn, it also gains Reactivate. This model's Controller controls the target during this activation. After this activation, the target cannot activate again this turn."

Sorry for the thread rez, but I had a follow up question after I noticed the wording change on Override Edict in the model errata PDF. Is the intention to allow a construct (let's say it has already activated) to immediately activate after Hoffman? Normally Reactivate grants an additional activation in the normal sequence, so your opponent would get a chance to activate something in between. Cheers

Good topic. Not sure if you caught this, but Point 1 was raised in another thread and answered by Nathan and other Wyrd staff in the subsequent pages: http://www.wyrd-games.net/showthread.php?31465-Wyrd-Miniatures-at-Gen-Con-2012/page5 Point 2 is certainly not ideal, but perhaps something could be done to incentivize pre-orders if the minis aren't available? Agree with point 3. For me personally, the reality is I won't buy minis unless it's a Nytmare or an alt prior to reading the book. Ideally, I would have liked Storm of Shadows to be released 1 month prior to Gencon. I have no doubt that copious amounts of impulse purchases will take place though

Sadly, no. I was really looking forward to this model when I saw all the Book 1 masters were getting an alt sculpt along with their avatars :-( Fingers crossed it's something Wyrd considers in the future.

I can't speak to how it was pre RM, since that is when I started playing. However, I disagree there is still a discrepancy now as it's clearly stated in the Casting AR section of Magic as to how it works (if and when) IMO. If it helps, here is a previous marshal answer to casting AR: http://www.wyrd-games.net/showthread.php?22511-Additional-spell-costs#3