egoon

No, the other sisters do not need LoS to place. As you say, they do not target until they do their Ml action. A place will allow you to change height. As long as there is room on the same level, the sisters end up base to base on the same level as the target.

Yes. If B is more than 2" away

And on the other end of the spectrum, I've won a tournament game of Turf War without killing a single model. I did lose a couple, though... =)

But windblast does not require a model to be pushed in relation to another object. So why would this rules apply? It is clearly an exception to the general rule.

My understanding is quite the opposite. I have not found anywhere in the book or FAQ that says that 'away from' is the default push. If you do please supply a reference. To me it seems natural to assume that if no direction is specified, you may push in any direction.

It's probably a good idea to make buildings climbable, or add steps or ladders or something. I personally dislike having terrain accessible by flying model only. Not sure about walking part way up. Without looking at the rules, I'd probably allow it. Don't have the book with me now though... Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's always base to base. Since model's height is not accurately represented by the model, and the Ht trait is used instead. Base to base is the only comparison that makes sense. If you make a small wall impassable and climbable, I'd subject it to the same rules as climbing in general. It's a little bit tricky as a model can't really stand atop a fence, so I'm not sure. In this case I'd probably make the model stop, and clear the entire wall in one action. We usually treat trees in a forrest as part of the forrest, just like you describe. Separate trees outside of a forrest would be blocking and hard cover. If it's a graveyard, I'd probably say that the whole yard is severe. I hope that helps a little =)

Ah. Sorry. I though it was an action. Should have checked the cards...

No, I don't think so. He is also not in play, and cannot be counted for scoring, I believe

That's how I read it as well

No. You can only use one soulstone per damage source. You also cannot use two soulstones to get ++ on an attack, for instance. One soulstone per effect and occasion. I don't have the book with me or I'd provide a quote and page number.

Yes!

You may also note that no Strategies use Scheme Markers, only Schemes. Some Strategies use Markers, but they are handled separately and cannot be dropped with abilities such as Finish the Job.

I would agree with Afeinman. Although leaping from Ht 4 to Ht 0 might actually make you take falling damage, since the ability does not state immunity to falling damage.

You always treat attacks as opposed duels. If you attack a non-undead model the difference just does not matter (as long as you win). This is not an automatic 2 damage. You can see that because it has 'Rst: Wp' Not sure about this. I would think you resolve the first charge completely before doing the second, but I don't have the book with me, so I can't check. Arrest has precedence. You must discard a card to charge. If you don't the charge fails (and the piglet can do nothing, assuming there is a legal target available)

To be fair, it does say that it's useless =)

As far as I've been able to understand, standing on a piece of terrain does not increase your 'effective' Ht. With the exception of Vantage points, and I admit to not quite understanding those rules.

Option 1, I think. The effect can't be completed and is scrapped altogether. Or maybe that was just how it was in the old edition...

Please add me as well. Name: Egoon / Bennie (Henchman) Country: Sweden City: Stockholm Stores: Dragon's Lair, Alphaspel And you can remove Arcane Online, since it has gone bankrupt...

Pierowmaniac: Sure, I could do that, I'd just prefer it if it was standardised better... Hagisman: Sure. That's why it would be nice if they were different sometimes. Reconnoiter will be flank in May-Aug and flank Sept-Dec. I kinda wish it would be standard or close in one of the periods. Or even better if it was Corner for two months, then Standard, Flank and Close for two months each. Wishful thinking I know, but as it is currently, unless we have four round tournaments, three of the strategies will never change deployment type...

Here in Sweden we mostly play 3 round tournaments. (The largest tournament I'm aware of had 12 attendees). So in the new gaining grounds the strategies and deployments rotate depending on the time of year. And if you only play 3 round tournaments Reckoning will always be corner deployment, Stake a claim will always be standard and Reconnoiter will always be flank. Only turf war will change between Standard and close. If this is intended I think it's kind of boring. A simple way to fix this, and introduce more variety would be to skew the deployment cycle by two months. Making the periods for deployment: March through June, July through October, November through February.

I agree with Carasz and Arli. I would play it without cover for the Stalker

Henchmen are not really connected to masters. Some are a better fit with specific masters and are included in that masters box. (McMourning and Sebastian for example) Other masters have no henchman in the box (Raspy...) And some henchmen are not connected to any specific master (Bishop) Lucius Totem: The Scribe Collodi Totem: Marionette Kaeris Totem: Eternal Flame Colette can have up to three mechanical doves. It's all in the wave 2 beta files: http://www.wyrd-games.net/forumdisplay.php?240-M2E-Wave-2-Beta

Note that One in the Crowd only gives -flip to Sh attacks. A model in base contact with the Torakage will normally not be able to use a Sh attack. There are of course exceptions like Ophelia and Convict Gunslinger

Yes. Models can block LoS. But they do not provide cover even if they do. The intervening model must have a Ht equal to or greater than both the others, and block every line that can be drawn between the models. This is usually accomplished by models with larger bases (such as the War Pig), or several 30mm models next to each other. ---------- Post added at 02:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:59 PM ---------- In the above example (D) the 2" melee range ronin can only strike belle #3 if there is an unobstructed line between them. if belle #1 and belle #2 are in base contact, there would be no LoS