Mr_Smigs Posted September 17, 2011 Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 Sue's shrug off is listed as a 1 ability... santiago has it as a 0.... which is correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Wodschow Posted September 17, 2011 Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 Not sure why you're not considering the possibility of both being correct. Family models have it as a (0), McTavish and Sue as a (1). If your assumption is right however and one of them is in fact listed wrongly then I'd say it's almost certainly Sue and Tavish that should instead have them as (0) actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Wodschow Posted September 17, 2011 Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 My post was intended as a reply to Smigs, you simply got there 6 minutes before I did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Akujie Posted September 17, 2011 Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 Guild usually have the quicker draw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Mr_Smigs Posted September 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 Not sure why you're not considering the possibility of both being correct. Family models have it as a (0), McTavish and Sue as a (1). If your assumption is right however and one of them is in fact listed wrongly then I'd say it's almost certainly Sue and Tavish that should instead have them as (0) actions. consistency in rules..... generally a rule that uses a similar mechanic but has different requirements has a different name (like headshot and the other kill or discard abilities) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 nerdelemental Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 (edited) I'm sure that when you all had the Search feature return a set of responses to your inquiry on known Twisting Fates errors, or "Sue" and "Shrug Off", for that matter, you must have overlooked this thread: edit: because now *I'm* being dumb.. ugh! It's been known since the very first day the book was released. Found by the Dev team. Sometimes you guys should really look up at the sky and realize that it's not always falling simply because we make a pretty basic error. Rules lawyer types among us should now strike up the Imperial March before pointing out that: 1) they are not rules lawyers, and 2) they're not rules lawyers because errors like this are: a) an indication of our poor craftsmanship and attention to detail, and the crux of all things wrong with the game and of course players cannot play the game if they do not know the proper AP cost of Shrug Off. I will agree with the latter point. This Shrug Off concern has ground the game to a horrible stop and if, like me, you simply cannot play it until all things related to Shrug Off are resolved...well then....maybe a good game of Anything Else is in order! In the meantime, we were working diligently upon the next book and providing fun and interesting new models with beautiful artwork and fabulous fluff, but now we're going to do nothing except ponder the myriad and intricate problems of Shrug Off since so many games hinge upon not only understanding how it works, but how game changing each casting of this oft misunderstood spell really is. I certainly know that for the eight months prior to Book I all the way to now it's come into play in one of my games....oh....uh....well - judging by all the recent hubbub....I sort of expected it to be genuinely relevant. edit: ugh! See! You get me riled up over STUPID issues and I start getting stupid, too! I linked to a Rules Marshal discussion, sorry. here's the answer: It's a typeaux. Shrug Off is a (0) Ap. Edited September 18, 2011 by nerdelemental Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Mr_Smigs Posted September 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 I'm sure that when you all had the Search feature return a set of responses to your inquiry on known Twisting Fates errors, or "Sue" and "Shrug Off", for that matter, you must have overlooked this thread: http://wyrd-games.net/forum/showthread.php?t=23624 what? the thread I can't access 'cause i'm not a dev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 nerdelemental Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 Sorry. My mistake. Fixed the post. I need a glass of wine to go with the whine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Ciaran Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 nerd: ROFL Thank you! I was indeed, not only going to play ANYTHING ELSE, I wasn't going to get ANY sleep tonight in my rage! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Ratty Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 It is ofc up on the Malifaux Website too.. http://www.malifaux.com/Fixes.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Mr_Smigs Posted September 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 thank you for the clarification sadly, searching "twisting fates errors" only returns this thread.... since the book only hit shelves yesterday here, i'm curious to make sure i understand this stuff right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 nerdelemental Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 Fair. Fair. Calm version: It's merely human error for a typo. We're unsure how this one got through. The editing was fierce. And mistakes still happened. Thank you all for your enthusiasm and continued support. Here's a fun emoticon: :thrasher: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Ratty Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 :aseamus Here's another fun Emoticon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 demkoenig Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 @nerdelemental: Amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Hookers Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 Fair. Fair. Calm version: It's merely human error for a typo. We're unsure how this one got through. The editing was fierce. And mistakes still happened. Thank you all for your enthusiasm and continued support. Here's a fun emoticon: :thrasher: you're going to need more than that bro. since you said rules lawyer more than twice in a thread i'm going to have to give you this :paralyzedpuppet:elefant::slap::gurney::peep::decision::rockon::amen::noevil::pcguru: and this :240::canabis: and one for drew :teddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Akujie Posted September 20, 2011 Report Share Posted September 20, 2011 Thanks for the malifaux fixes link, never knew it exsisted! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Keltheos Posted September 20, 2011 Report Share Posted September 20, 2011 Sue and McTavish both have it listed as (1) where it should be (0). Their cards will be correct. And done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Mr_Smigs
Sue's shrug off is listed as a 1 ability... santiago has it as a 0....
which is correct?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
16 answers to this question
Recommended Posts