Murphy'sLawyer Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 (edited) I love the Pull My Finger Wiki but have noticed there are still holes in the Tactica and Henchman sections. Also there are no entries for Book 3 so I thought I would make a community rally call to pitch in. I too will look over some sections to see if I can pitch in too. Let's make this thing shiny. Edited September 5, 2011 by Murphy'sLawyer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 I approve of this thread. That is all. Don't be shy about jumping in over there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murphy'sLawyer Posted September 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 We can even do a faction a week as a special focus. This week we can focus on the Outcast (Randomly picked) and then focus on another faction the following week. Doesn't seem overwhelming to the Mega Posters that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boardgameguy Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 Great idea, let's get this thing going. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jty3 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Awesome, I'm just getting into the game and would love to see some of the book three and even book two options that don't have anything yet analyzed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karn987 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Definitely like this idea... going to post it in the super thread and send out a mass mailer to everyone on the wiki. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicpockets Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Can I ask a more basic question - lots on the Hamelin page is out of date or wrong (for example, it says about cheating a card into a duel and then picking it back up when you opponent cheats to use "again and again" but this isn't actually how it works) - what's the rules re a total rewrite from the ground up? I don't mind doing it with a lot more anti-faction/scheme/strategy info in there, but wanted to check that was cool before doing something like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karn987 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Can I ask a more basic question - lots on the Hamelin page is out of date or wrong (for example, it says about cheating a card into a duel and then picking it back up when you opponent cheats to use "again and again" but this isn't actually how it works) - what's the rules re a total rewrite from the ground up? I don't mind doing it with a lot more anti-faction/scheme/strategy info in there, but wanted to check that was cool before doing something like that. Generally it requires mod approval. You start a discussion on his page requesting permission for it. We look into it quickly and give a response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adran Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Part of the problem is that book 3 isn't widely availble yet. let alone the actual models (still waiting for my book) and that it takes several games with a figure to really know how it works. There have been enough changes on cards when they are released to discourage too much proxying of stuff. But I'll join the rally for the first two books. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karn987 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Part of the problem is that book 3 isn't widely availble yet. let alone the actual models (still waiting for my book) and that it takes several games with a figure to really know how it works. There have been enough changes on cards when they are released to discourage too much proxying of stuff. But I'll join the rally for the first two books. Exactly what we need! We need to get this Book 1 and 2 stuff finished and one so that we can focus on Book 3. Glad to have you with us Adran! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyrrn Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Is anyone going to go in and clean up the numerous spelling and grammatical mistakes? Some parts are nearly incomprehensible where it seems the author began one thought, changed course mid-stream, and essentially mixed two sentences into one incomplete sentence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karn987 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Is anyone going to go in and clean up the numerous spelling and grammatical mistakes? Some parts are nearly incomprehensible where it seems the author began one thought, changed course mid-stream, and essentially mixed two sentences into one incomplete sentence. No 1 person is tasked with this yet. This is all done on a volunteer basis, so if you want to do it... then by all means go for it! The Wiki will be as good as the Community is willing to make it. The admins do a lot of work on it, and it's taken a lot of time to get where it is. But we really need the Community to help us out even more then they already are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Posted September 7, 2011 Report Share Posted September 7, 2011 Can I ask a more basic question - lots on the Hamelin page is out of date or wrong (for example, it says about cheating a card into a duel and then picking it back up when you opponent cheats to use "again and again" but this isn't actually how it works) - what's the rules re a total rewrite from the ground up? I don't mind doing it with a lot more anti-faction/scheme/strategy info in there, but wanted to check that was cool before doing something like that. As to the Hamelin thing specifically - I trust your judgement. Do it to it. Is anyone going to go in and clean up the numerous spelling and grammatical mistakes? Some parts are nearly incomprehensible where it seems the author began one thought, changed course mid-stream, and essentially mixed two sentences into one incomplete sentence. If this is you offering, then this is me accepting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nilus Posted September 7, 2011 Report Share Posted September 7, 2011 Is anyone going to go in and clean up the numerous spelling and grammatical mistakes? Some parts are nearly incomprehensible where it seems the author began one thought, changed course mid-stream, and essentially mixed two sentences into one incomplete sentence. +1 million. Mostly because I am going to start helping and I long ago sacrificed my ability to write coherently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.