Reservoir Dog

I'm in

I've got one and I'm uk based of you want to send me a pm

what about a little gremlin outhouse (for posh gremlins that don't like to crap where they live)

Just bumping this as it'd be nice to see a few more people sign up.

Ticket bought. Are you releasing scenes and starts on the day or beforehand?

Ticket bought for my first trip Hockley

I don't think I'll get into shop before the day so I've sent the money through PayPal.

I'm in for definite. Hopefully will pay you in person as I plan on getting to the shop sooner rather than later. I really hope this event is supported as I'd love the scene to take of in Worcester

hoping to get to this. Will confirm at end of May

Would the widow weavers web markers combine with Dreamers crow trigger on his twist reality attack? Ie do the web markers mean that a wp5 model within 3 inches could be paralyzed? I think they would as web markers reduce wp by 1 and then dreamers attack paralyzes a model if it has wp4 or less, but I just wanted to check.

Just looking at Dreamers surrounded by nightmares ability on the tantrum upgrade and I just wanted to check something. If target is surrounded by 3 nightmares would it suffer 1 damage 3 times (which is how the card reads to me-ie like Pandora misery) or 3 damage once?

I'm hoping to come to this, can you put my name down and I'll pay in a few days

Can you put me on the list Dave and I'l get the funds to you at the end of the month?

@santaclaws01 and @Ludvig I've only got one thing to say to you two: I was wrong and you were right. I'm actually happy with that. I will now have Earl follow Zipp around handing out suits as I'm happy that if challenged I could use Sandeeps action and the rules for interacting as an example. I still find the wording of Earls ability to be odd but maybe that's just me. Ive been doing ok with Zipp anyway and this seems to just take his mobility up another level.

As you can see above I'm not disagreeing with you about disengaging strikes. I even included the passage from the rulebook myself. I wholeheartedly agree that disengaging strikes take place. What I'm saying is that a TRIGGER to walk from an attack is not you resolving a completely seperate action where you have an ap to spend on what you want and therefore doesn' t include the declare action phase. Its a triggered walk action not a declared walk action. Youre not declaring a seperate walk action youre taking a trigger that allows a walk action and as Earls ability specifies it works when a walk action is declared it doesn' work as you haven't actually declared a walk action at any point (as I read the rules). To be clear: 1. You declare the ATTACK action and spend 1ap. 2. You perform the duel 3. You resolve the results of the duel (including triggers). It is at this stage you take a walk action with the trigger and follow the applicable rules for a walk (including disengaging strikes). But at no point has Zipp actually declared a walk action (it was a trigger which was declared not an actual walk action) and therefore Earl cannot hitch a ride. I know youve included the bit about obeys to assist your view on this but in my opinion this is like comparing apples and oranges. Obeys work differently to this as obeys are not triggers and actually give out 1ap (you then declare what you'e spending that 1ap on) whereas Zipps trigger is purely for a walk action. Ie you can't take the trigger and then declare a different action. There is nothing to declare as the trigger itself has already specified what action your taking. I've seen a number of posts from you regarding other rules on the forum and in the most part I've previously agreed with what you say. However, on this occasion I think we're going to have to agree to disagree until there is an official clarification in the faq. As a Zipp player I really hope I'm wrong but I will continue playing it as I've noted above until there is an official faq. Just for clarity though, can I also ask why you think Earls ability is worded as "when a sky pirate within 1 declares a walk action" As opposed to "when a sky pirate within 1 takes a walk action" if every walk action (no matter how it' generated) begins with a declaration? It seems to me that the very point of adding the phrase "declares a walk" is a conscous decision by the writers? Ie if the phrase was "takes a walk action" we wouldn' even be having this discussion.