irishdave Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Can you do this? If so who flips for the defender? ---------- Post added at 06:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ---------- For example can joss butcher an electrical creation turn 1 to create 2 scrap for ramos' to summon loads of arachnids? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Joel Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Yes, you can attack other friendly models, you flip for both the attack and defence, and can cheat either or both if you wish. A model cannot attack itself however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Dracomax Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 For example can joss butcher an electrical creation turn 1 to create 2 scrap for ramos' to summon loads of arachnids? Yes. Joss will take 1 damage from the EC's Explosive demise, after Armor, and there will be two scrap. Ramos will only be able to summon off of one of them in the turn, but it will be there for next turn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Hockridge Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Can a model target itself with tactical actions? Or Ca actions? Such as say Myranda healing herself or The Captian Airbursting himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Omenbringer Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Yes, you can attack other friendly models, you flip for both the attack and defence, and can cheat either or both if you wish. You also have the option of having the friendly target Relent the duel prior to any cards being flipped. In this case the attacker flips, the defender does not. It is assumed the defender ties the attackers result without any suits incurring a http://themostexcellentandawesomeforumever-wyrd.com/community/uploads/emoticons/default_Minus.png' alt=':-fate'> :-fate on the damage flip. The defender may not declare triggers when it relents though the attacker may. Page 33 in the "Attacking Friendly Models" call out ---------- Post added at 02:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:09 PM ---------- Can a model target itself with tactical actions? Or Ca actions? Such as say Myranda healing herself or The Captian Airbursting himself. Generally speaking, Models are always considered to have LoS to themselves (page 40 under "Drawing Line of Sight") and the model should always be within range of itself. So unless otherwise stated in the specific abilities/ Actions rule a model should be able to target itself with an action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Mako Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Models cannot use an Attack Action on themselves, unless specifically allowed by the attack - page 38 of the rules. Basically, if it has a resist (i.e. requires an opposed duel), and doesn't say that the model can target itself, you can't do it. Tactical actions (simple duels) seem to be ok though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Dracomax Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Models cannot use an Attack Action on themselves, unless specifically allowed by the attack - page 38 of the rules. Basically, if it has a resist (i.e. requires an opposed duel), and doesn't say that the model can target itself, you can't do it. Tactical actions (simple duels) seem to be ok though. In M2E, that isn't quite right, as there are tactical actions that require a resist, and Attack actions that produce TNs. However, attack actions are clearly labeled on the card, so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Mako Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 I was going off the definitions on page 38 of the book: Those actions that do not require an Opposed Duel are called Tactical Actions Any action a model performs which requires an Opposed Duel is considered an Attack Action But yeah, they're split on the cards so it's pretty obvious regardless. Out of interest, which Tacticals have a resist? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Dracomax Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 I was going off the definitions on page 38 of the book: But yeah, they're split on the cards so it's pretty obvious regardless. Out of interest, which Tacticals have a resist? You know, the ones I was thinking about that I could have sworn were tactical actions, on looking at the actual entry in the book are attack actions. 's what I get for not double checking myself first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 hypoking Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Out of interest, which Tacticals have a resist? Tacticals I'm not sure of, but off the top of my head I can think of at least two attack actions that have no resist and require no opposed duel. I swear, you just got to love Ophelia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Justin Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Tacticals I'm not sure of, but off the top of my head I can think of at least two attack actions that have no resist and require no opposed duel. I swear, you just got to love Ophelia. Oh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 hypoking Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Ooh a girl and with my eyes closed are both listed as attack actions. God knows why, but they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 irishdave Posted October 26, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Cheers, was looking under the attack/ actions section if rules... didn't bother checking opposed duels. Cest la vie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Omenbringer Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 To bad the Index doesn't help much with locating things like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Necrofaux Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 To bad the Index doesn't help much with locating things like this. That is the main thing I hate about this book. Finding things is such a chore with that terrible excuse for an index. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Ausplosions Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 To bad the Index doesn't help much with locating things like this. Yeah. Wyrd seems to have difficulty Indexing their books. At least it's not quite as bad as 1st edition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Omenbringer Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 Yeah. Wyrd seems to have difficulty Indexing their books. At least it's not quite as bad as 1st edition. Really? You honestly think this Index is better? Most terms could be easily referenced in the earlier books (Each of the earlier books had 6 pages of fairly small font dedicated to the Glossary/ Index, this book has 2 Large Font pages). The only thing the earlier books were missing where some less common abilities. Off topic of course but curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Ausplosions Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 At least now you don't have to find the entry in the book and download an errata, and search for Rules Marshall rulings and rub your belly and pat your head while singing Row Row Row your boat, just to find a rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Omenbringer Posted October 26, 2013 Report Share Posted October 26, 2013 (edited) At least now you don't have to find the entry in the book and download an errata, and search for Rules Marshall rulings and rub your belly and pat your head while singing Row Row Row your boat, just to find a rule. I would preface that with a big yet. Faq/ Errata/ Clarification is necessary in any game and as more books get released Rules Bloat and updates will increase as well, it seems to be a bit of an inevitable cycle. We'll see how large the first Faq/ Errata Doc is come November 1st. Edited October 26, 2013 by Omenbringer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
irishdave
Can you do this? If so who flips for the defender?
---------- Post added at 06:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------
For example can joss butcher an electrical creation turn 1 to create 2 scrap for ramos' to summon loads of arachnids?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
18 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.