Jakob Lynch's "(+1)Card Trick: This model's Controller Discards 1 Control Card, then this model receives 1 General AP. This AP cannot be used to Cast Spells."
VERSUS
Gremlin's "(+1)Reckless: This model may suffer 1 Wd to receive (+1)Fast."
Rules as Written
Currently, so long as Jakob Lynch has a hand, he has an incredibly high number of AP he may spend, as there is no limitation on the amount of AP he may gain through discarding Cards to receive additional AP.
This is especially problematic if his player gets a lucky streak with his two Dead Man's Hand spells, as he could have something around 7-9 AP in a single Activation.
This is incredibly overpowered because of the Auto-trigger on his gun that can do incredibly high amounts of additional damage.
Our Question
Is Jakob Lynch's (+1) Card Trick intended to give him an absurd number of AP if he so chooses?
Question
hippieshopper
Jakob Lynch's "(+1)Card Trick: This model's Controller Discards 1 Control Card, then this model receives 1 General AP. This AP cannot be used to Cast Spells."
VERSUS
Gremlin's "(+1)Reckless: This model may suffer 1 Wd to receive (+1)Fast."
Rules as Written
Currently, so long as Jakob Lynch has a hand, he has an incredibly high number of AP he may spend, as there is no limitation on the amount of AP he may gain through discarding Cards to receive additional AP.
This is especially problematic if his player gets a lucky streak with his two Dead Man's Hand spells, as he could have something around 7-9 AP in a single Activation.
This is incredibly overpowered because of the Auto-trigger on his gun that can do incredibly high amounts of additional damage.
Our Question
Is Jakob Lynch's (+1) Card Trick intended to give him an absurd number of AP if he so chooses?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
13 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.