Jump to content
  • 0

Constriction


Mycellanious

Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Constriction is poorly phrased, because technically the Disengage Action does not generate any duels - it generates another Action, and that action generates duels.

With that in mind, I think that the intent is that it effects both attack duels by by enemy models when one of your models Disengages, and resist duels made by enemy models that are Disengaging. Otherwise, it would say the specific duel affected, such as "resist duels made during a disengage action."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Engaged and Engaging are different rules-wise. A model can be engaged and not engaging and vice versa.

In this case Constriction is only applied to the models engaged by "this model" (a model isn't engaging himself), so this is only applied to enemy models; not to the Rattler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
7 minutes ago, Ogid said:

Engaged and Engaging are different rules-wise. A model can be engaged and not engaging and vice versa.

In this case Constriction is only applied to the models engaged by "this model" (a model isn't engaging himself), so this is only applied to enemy models; not to the Rattler.

I think he means if the Rattler disengages and the enemy makes an attack, does that attack get a minus.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information