TeddyBear

Hi guys, would anyone please share a character card (any, but possibly with all suits) of the ones used in beta-tests?
While i'm not at all practical, i am looking for a program that can convert cards, from pdf to word, without messing everything up. I have tried many, but the writings overlap, the symbols are not recognized and the sizes are completely wrong. Now you are wondering, why do this, when you can easily print them from the site? Simply because between the tarot dimensions, between the colors, between the fact that to print a card that can be handled comfortably... i must necessarily use a sheet with larger watermark; i consume a lot of time, money and waste of materials. For some time i have also opted to buy cards on Wgv, but now, i have also started to receive customs taxes here in Eu; i have several pieces and usually need almost all the new cards, in short, these are all costs that i would prefer to invest in future miniatures. I asked Wyrd if there could ever "printable-friendly" cards version, but i don't think it will be in their plans. Would anyone have any suggestions or advice? Thank you.

@murakiit could be as you say. actually I hadn't thought about the "number of cards" speech and it might make sense. but not even GG were changed (not that this is a big problem) but it was one of the reasons why I thought maybe they had more urgent commitments.

I agree with others. moleman didn't see game, so their buff might as well be fine. but undoubtedly chimeras did not need other optimal pieces. (as i already claimed, they could have nerfed cerberus or blessed, or even just cerberus: one suggestion i made was to remove "deadly parsuit" from models with built-in leap)

however, the strong feeling I had is that wyrd didn't have too much time to make all changes, also based on what they wrote in the release. I had the impression that these choices were made in a hurry or they are incomplete in any case.

I've already tried, but trying again costs nothing: I ask wyrd, could you please give us a "printable-friendly" version of the character cards? Like the versions used in the beta tests (no images or other, only with writing.)?

I guess it could be an idea that many players would really appreciate!

I would like to ask, don't anyone of you, find that augmented is generally very optimal in both factions? nothing npe, but I'd rather see the other guild masters in tournaments more often. 

On 19/1/2022 at 23:50, ShinChan said:

 

• Razorspine Rattler: Hanno bisogno di un po' d'amore. O aumentano leggermente la loro durata, il loro danno inflitto o danno loro qualche utilità minore, ma in questo momento si trovano in un punto in cui l'unica cosa in cui sono abbastanza bravi è muoversi.

 

Marcus has so many pieces that I think it's very, very difficult to give to all an optimal role. I find it right to buff those pieces who never see the game (moleman, razorspine) but at the same time those that are too optimal should be nerfed. As I said in another post, I find it really wrong that a leap model with auto-included trigger, can also have deadly parsuit. By reducing the movement capacity of these heavily used pieces, perhaps the Razorspine would have seen more play, even if their characteristics remains improvable.

On 1/30/2022 at 11:46 AM, Maniacal_cackle said:

🤣 Azahul is abslutely smashing the Malifaux World Series using Tara. 8 diff in two rounds against two championship players xD

I think Tara needs a nerf!

by chance these games were recorded? I would be curious to see them

I think it's a bit utopian, but I'd like to see the swarming-crews being simplified, to be used more often in tournaments, within time limits.

however, the only thing I feel like saying (in my opinion) is that models with built-in leap shouldn't have deadly pursuit as well. it is an excessive amount of movement, difficult to "contain" for opponents(which also can be further enhanced by the upgrades). So it's okay give a "buff" ti unused models, but necessarily try "to limit" at least a little,  the rest.

a curiosity please, what position is the marcus crew in overall? it seems to me super performing currently or am I wrong? maybe it is not played a lot in tournaments?

guys, but what do you think of amalgam in general? and specifically, of the desolation engine?

I don't find them very "bright" overall, especially after the nerf of summons; a few comments ago, however, I read that some Russian players think that the Leveticus crew is among the strongest in the faction: that you know, is there any video-battlereport that can testify to these claims?

as much as it may be of interest (since I find myself by chance in the discussion and often play with tara) although I think that Aionus can actually be improved a little bit, in terms of stats of the actions; I personally would NEVER trade a similar "buff" with the trigger on Sever Timeline.

please, don't take what I'm about to say too seriously. I ask this question to more experienced players. I was wondering, would it be too strong (after the various nerfs that his keyword suffered) to give A&D the option of not getting "summoned tokens"?

Hi guys, i haven't played well in Malifaux for a long time and i'm completely rusty on all fronts. 
Some new third edition keywords have awakened my curiosity, including Cadmus; mainly because of its unique play style as well as the gorgeous miniatures; the idea of a hive mind that has awakened from a lethargy is brilliant, the single upgrade that moves between the pieces .. well what to say? Wow Amazing!!!!
I have not yet had the opportunity to try it, nor to see it play so i ignore its potential but from what i read, by many players it is considered a npe keyword.
I realize that at the moment it is pure speculation, also in virtue of the fact that soon the masters with new titles will be released and they will probably change the meta...but I would like to ask you please, (possibly someone who has managed to use this keyword many times, or someone who has even managed to bring it into a tournament)
In your opinion, what will be the changes that will be made on cadmus? or what changes do you think are right to make?

 

Nexus has this ability:

Could she then target the same model from which she take Los, assuming the latter has a parasite token?

For example, if I have several models in a row, each at 4 "distance from each other, can I use this ability on one at greater distance (multiple of 4)? For example at 12" or 16 "?

Thanks!

sorry i haven't played in a while .. but Youko's action isn't once per turn? does it make sense to use it with Terraccotta when you can do it with her? once per turn is now per model?

I am confident in the changes chosen by Wyrd, however (I don't know if anyone has already said this) in addition to all the debuffs you mentioned on Leveticus, there is one that worries me about evocations:
All the models summoned and those that will eventually replaced, will not able in any case, to interact with the strategy markers.

@Nagi21 Obey was no nerfed, they only change the strategy... note: also Amina exploited obey.. an no.. i'm not purely an arcanists player. 😉 

However in this post we are talking everyone (me too) for nothing because:
https://themostexcellentandawesomeforumever-wyrd.com/topic/149189-adepticon-details/?tab=comments#comment-1208189

as i know they, they have alredy fixed several things, for sure!

although the arcanists are definitely a tier faction, I don't think these two pieces are to be nerfed.
like no other pieces of other factions, for the moment.

this edition of the game is still too young: there are masters that still lack parts of their keywords.

a separate discussion should be made for all-stars lists, but it is not necessary that the pieces have to be nerfed, maybe they could only change the costs or the hiring rules.

instead we could talk about masters that should be enhanced, or simplified in use:
that could be more useful.

I will not comment the artwork, not to attract admins here as last time.. 

I just say: WOW!!

For me they will be double faction:

E.s./Ress. 🤔

1 hour ago, Nathan Caroland said:

Nope.

Ya'll love on and hate on the same artists all the time, just depends on the characters. Cracks me up.

Really!? 😮 Yet, traits of drawing looks very different from (for example) M3e Viktorias or Colette or Lady J... (for me, at least)

P.s. and anyway it's not true! 😁 I love all characters of this game! I became poor with malifaux, in a short time i will leave my house to the miniatures 😁

Finally "a return" to the old Malifaux!

I love the style of this designer!

I'm almost sure he is the same of new Mcm and Levi!!

28 minutes ago, Gnomezilla said:

I think they are still packing Black Friday orders and then doing all the work which should have been done the week after Black Friday.

I’m waiting also. I want to write and may as well use that urge to write battle reports

Ah you're right! I completely forget about post-black friday amount of work!

I hope they have also good news about new special orders, my brand new lucius needs his agent 46! 😎

When will we know if we have been accepted or not?

I think that @Morgan Vening had a good idea, for example in my meta, some people started playing again, "feeling reassured" by the fact, that they could use their only masters that they had (dmh in fact) it must be said that even the shopkeepers / henchman do their "interest", i think nobody wants to lose  a customer, so when he organizes a tournament (if that player only has dmh, he will use dmh! it seems obvious to me..)

These rules, do not have to be inevitably home rules, they could be also official rules.. i would also add that: "dmh masters, should be used only with keywords and versatile models of their original faction."

After all, Wyrd had been clear about Dmh, they would have been "particular" models and repeatedly had asked us to test them carefully. Only with time and admitting them to tournaments, however, will it be possible to arrive at right decision.