Shared Plant Evidence: On or Completely On your opponent's side of the table?

[Alviaran]

Pretty much what it says on the tin. Given that Stake a Claim uses the language "completely on" your opponent's side of the table (as does the normal Plant Evidence), and Shared Plant Evidence says "On", does this mean I can Plant Evidence on terrain features that straddle the middle of the table, on both my opponent's and my side of the table?

[LordZombie]

I can't anywhere in the rules that you couldn't. Just means your opponent can do the same.

[Cadilon]

We run into this sometimes when we don't have enough terrain, the terrain piece is really large, or the terrain its just laid out oddly. We house rule it that you can interact with the part of the terrain that complies with the requirement. So for Plant Evidence you have to interact with the part of the terrain that's on the opponent's half of the table.

Not sure how this would be ruled officially, but it just seems to lead to too many inequities and difficulties if any straddling terrain piece was disqualified or if you could plant on your half of the table.

Edited January 17, 2013 by Cadilon

[Sarsnick]

We run into this sometimes when we don't have enough terrain, the terrain piece is really large, or the terrain its just laid out oddly. We house rule it that you can interact with the part of the terrain that complies with the requirement. So for Plant Evidence you have to interact with the part of the terrain that's on the opponent's half of the table.

Not sure how this would be ruled officially, but it just seems to lead to too many inequities and difficulties if any straddling terrain piece was disqualified or if you could plant on your half of the table.

We play as it's worded (so a hill that is on both halves cannot be captured) but we make sure both sides have an equal amount of possible objectives that are entirely in the area.