perdita and terror

[bloodylepricon]

when Perdita comes into the range of terrifying, does she have to take a WP - TN , being that it is not a WP-WP duel?

[Kadeton]

Yes, sadly. Simple duels have no attacker or defender, so Immune to Influence doesn't come into effect.

One thing I'd really like to see in a rules update would be a change to the duel syntax that allowed for an attacker and defender in any duel, indicated by the arrow. So a Terrifying duel could be a 13 -> Wp duel, clearly indicating that the testing model is the defender in this case.

For now, c'est la vie. Immune to Influence does not affect Terrifying, or any other simple Willpower duel.

[bloodylepricon]

thank you for the info. will have to let my guild friend know. "long live the smiling mad hatter"

[Wolfgar]

It's not so much that a simple duel do not have an attacker or a defender, it's that Terrifying duels are not an attack as defined by the rules and therefore do not have a defender.

Attacks are

and Strikes

Spells with or

Spells with a Resist

Actions that cause Damage

Actions that cause Wounds

Actions that result in an Opposed Duel

Ain't one of those, then it ain't an attack.

[Oshova]

It's not so much that a simple duel do not have an attacker or a defender, it's that Terrifying duels are not an attack as defined by the rules and therefore do not have a defender.

Attacks are

and Strikes

Spells with or

Spells with a Resist

Actions that cause Damage

Actions that cause Wounds

Actions that result in an Opposed Duel

Ain't one of those, then it ain't an attack.

So throwing objects at my opponent is not classed as an attack? . . . Intersting =p

[Wolfgar]

So throwing objects at my opponent is not classed as an attack? . . . Interesting =p

More of a breach of etiquette than anything else.