Jump to content

khilin

Vote Enabled
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by khilin

  1. I think solkan is right, the created markers are terrain. All of the other sections of the rulebook seem to imply that the created markers (both Web Markers and Ice Pillar Markers) are considered terrain markers.

    Also, if we decide to use the ruling that they are valid targets, the Strategy markers for Turf War (m3e version) which are Impassable should also be considered valid target for Search the Ruins.

    Quote

    Turf War (r)
    Divide the table into four table quarters. In the center
    of each table quarter, Drop a neutral Strategy Marker.
    Drop another neutral Strategy Marker in the center of
    the table. Strategy Markers are Impassable.

     

  2. Hi all!

    Yesterday, during a m3e match a question arise regarding what are considered terrain pieces.

    We were playing Dreamer (including Widow Weaver & the Bandersnatch in his crew) vs Rasputina (with a Silent one on hers). The strategy was Turf war and one of the schemes was Search the ruins.

    1. Both crew can create markers with terrain traits, are they considered terrain pieces for the purpose of Search the ruins? This is from the markers section of the manual:
      Quote

      Unless otherwise noted, Markers do not
      count as terrain and have no vertical distance
      (i.e., Height or Size). Markers that count as
      terrain will have one or more Terrain Traits
      (such as a Concealing, Severe Dust Cloud
      Marker).

    2. Because of the strategy there are 5 Strategy Markers in the table each with the Impassable trait. Are they considered terrain pieces for the purpose of Search the ruins? 

    We have a very lengthy discussion about these in our meta Whatsapp group with no consensus. We decided to play that they were not valid targets, but the question remains unanswered...

    Thank you all!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information