@Dreygan
"Taking ryle, does not prevent you from taking steamborg executioner or steampunk arachnids or any other archanist construct without a special forces tag that fits within that rule."
Nope, just the one, which is why it feels so wrong to me?
@Nilus
That is the greatest story ever told. I have already begun work on my House Ruled Ryle/Miner/Corphee Duet Love Triangle Crew.
---------- Post added at 01:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:41 PM ----------
"Taking ryle, does not prevent you from taking steamborg executioner or steampunk arachnids or any other archanist construct without a special forces tag that fits within that rule."
That's exactly why I feel like my interpretation should be "more correct" the rule clearly lets you take the REST of the Arcanist constructs, and limits JUST the Soulstone Miner. That's the conflicting part of the rule, that to me, doesn't make sense. Arcanist Ties is clearly a "Unlocks Arcanist Construct" rule in intent. Then, due to a SF wording, placing an extra restriction for crew building, a single Arcanist Construct is dis-included from that list, but ONLY when taking Ryle.
I read the intent of the rule, as being that Hoffman can take any Arcanist Constructs, and the idea that the Miner is banned, but only when taking Ryle, seems like an unintended rule conflict. Unless it's literally interpreted as "any"?
Or if we assume Nilus' story is correct... which I'm more and more inclined to do.