Ama no Zako and obeyed 1AP charges

[ckucharski12]

Ama no Zako obeyed a model to take a 1 AP action that cannot declare triggers.  The obeyed model was an oni within asami's 1 AP charge bubble. The oni took the 1 AP charge action.  

Here is the question:  are the two 1 AP close attacks resulting from the charge able to declare triggers? Couldn't find an exact scenario in FAQ.  During the game, we decided the intent of the rule is no triggers can be declared.  However, an argument can also be made that the attacks can declare triggers because the obeyed 1 AP action was the charge action during which no triggers were declared. The two close attacks would then fall under the actions causing actions call out box and be independent of the first AP such that the no trigger clause from Ama's obey do not apply. The FAQ regarding focus and charge attacks provides some support for this idea as the focus condition only applies to one of the close attacks as declared.

What are your thoughts on how this should be handled?

[Dogmantra]

Those attacks should be able to declare triggers. Only the action that Ama No Zako forced cannot declare triggers.

The charge is not resolved until both attacks have been resolved and both attacks are considered a part of the charge so you wouldn't be able to declare any trigger during those attacks.

It depends on the wording - the charge is not considered resolved so if it said "The target may not declare triggers for the duration of the action" then sure, but as it is it says "The action may not declare triggers" and the charge didn't declare triggers.

[Ludvig]

The charge is not resolved until both attacks have been resolved and both attacks are considered a part of the charge so you wouldn't be able to declare any trigger during those attacks.

[Ludvig]

Damn. How sloppy of me.