Firebox

I was in bed with my girlfriend when I read this rules pack. Now I know why they call them soft scores.

It's SILURID.

S I L U R I D.

Cool, thanks. This community has been awesome with answering some really dumb questions of mine. ^^;;

I wasn't to worried about it either way. All it takes for me is a moderately luck flip on the Stitched Togethers spell to kill one, and after absolutely destroying a Lady J crew with them, I wasn't to worried.

Ahh awesome, another new player discovering that the best way to deal with problematic models is to simply play Neverborn!

Can you target yourself? Can't find anything that says you can't but ramos' combat mechanic spell was changed in v2 to this model ir target friendly model from target friendly model.

-Heretic

You specifically can't target yourself under normal circumstances. Its in the rulebook somewhere.

wait wait wait...

so a Ht 2 model at the base of a 6" building, is 4" away from the model when trying to do melee to a model on the top of the building at the edge...

but 0 inches away when trying to shoot it?

Yep.

Remember, rules are an abstraction, not reality.

She absolutely can take Gunsmiths (this is why people shouldn't use the crew creator as gospel). But again, depending on the ruling mentioned above, you may lose your ability to summon Wicked Dolls as a conflicting special forces.

Mechanical Rider is, imho, the best rider. It's ultra fast, it hits hard, but its a glass cannon. Well balanced imho. Shame it doesnt have Drag Along though.

Because Event is defined and it does not define the Phases as an event. Kind of how Things that Effect Walk do not effect Charge. realistically its just the same thing at different speeds. but they are defined as two different things. Alps if you walk within 1" of me doesn't hit models that charge within 1" of them because they Charged, not walked. different definitions.

Is it your LGS that is being obtuse, or you?

All of these questions are answered in the rules forum by searching. In any case, if your LGS doesnt accept forum rulings, then there's little value in discussing them here and cluttering up the forum further, right?

From the link with the official ruling yes it does work, but as stated multiple times about my LGS, sense the book itself does not state that, they do not count it. forum ruling or not, its not in the book.

Oh, that extends to official rulings too? Lol. Get a new LGS would be my advice.

Alternatively, we can recommend you some broken crews that have been fixed via rulings on the forum, but since they ignore the forum they wont count. Once you beat them with said lists, maybe they'll see why there's a rules forum

I should be able to make this I think. It will be my first tournament, so go easy on me.

All that stats on P13 is they are buried with there buffs, it does not stat they are not effected by the resolves effect step. and just going by that alone with no additional ruling all that means is if somethings burred with say a terror buff then later brought back that turn it still has terror, but at the end phase, the buff goes away regardless if hes on the bored or not because the bury rule only stats unaffected by "Effects and Events" Phases are neither Effects or Events. Not sure if you read the whole post or not but think you missed the part where my LGS is hard set on not accepting forum rulings.

Couple of things here:

The resolve effects step explicitly removes effects from models in play.

Buried models are explicitly not in play.

By the rulebook, this works, no forum rules involved.

Although if your LGS does not accept forum rulings and such, I'd suggest that the real issue here is your LGS, not anything else. All of these rulings can be found in the rules forum answered by marshals or Sketch, so do some searching and print them out maybe, or take a good mobile device gaming with you? Or just break out the fists and explain to people why they're wrong.

and to the companion thing, sense my LGS is unacceptable of forum rulings sense the Dreamer and Chompy themselves do not have Companion you have to start with a Daydream which companions one of the two but has no way to companion another daydream in anyway.

Not sure why. You were linked a ruling by the lead rules guy further up this thread that specifically states that this is how companion works. Not sure what more you want or what more we can give you?

I just don't like Henchman!

Thats what I heard!

I eat rulebooks for breakfast.

Or sometimes toast.

So why can they not just release an actual FAQ/Errata? This forum rule system is all just confusing. Rules are titled under inaccurate or just non helpful titles making searching difficult, they then just get pushed down the pages by newer posts making them harder to find, and most of the answer are by just other players which even if they are right, trying to win an argument on rules because "That guy" said it works is as easy as trying to clap your hands while doing a hand stand with your hands are tied behind your back after having your hands amputated... ( i'd keep going but im tired of saying hands... )

Was like the issue i had with buried few weeks ago, i got 9 or 10 people saying yes that works that way but no one at my LGS accepted it until a Rules Marshal said Yes that is exactly how it works.

So yes you may be right and justified via Rules Marshals or something, but with no authorized power especially when the main rule book itself says your wrong and no other reference point to look at... how is this helpful?

Thread is here for reference:

http://wyrd-games.net/forum/showthread.php?t=24299

But yeh, the current rules/errata/faq system is something a lot of people have asked to be improved.