Mister Shine

This is what Im referring to (from Wyrd Place on FB)

This is what Im referring to (from Wyrd Place on FB)

So main rules book discusses accuracy modifiers we all know and love - tie is double neg, 1-5 is neg, etc

But in the Mini Rulebook there is an extra row saying Red Joker is severe+weak in the callout box. I assume that the Dmg Chart was copied and pasted and the red joker was mistakenly left in, but can we get an official "yeah thats right, RJ is not auto severe+weak on dmg" on it for tournaments and such?

So main rules book discusses accuracy modifiers we all know and love - tie is double neg, 1-5 is neg, etc

But in the Mini Rulebook there is an extra row saying Red Joker is severe+weak in the callout box. I assume that the Dmg Chart was copied and pasted and the red joker was mistakenly left in, but can we get an official "yeah thats right, RJ is not auto severe+weak on dmg" on it for tournaments and such?

That doesnt sound like it would eat up his personal life for weeks

That doesnt sound like it would eat up his personal life for weeks

About your ice golem....

About your ice golem....

I dont work in the industry so my completely uniformed opinion is probably right

....mnyep

---------- Post added at 08:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 AM ----------

And yeah, I do not envy the GW design team. They are still the largest company by far, even with this latest news. It's gotta be hard for them each time they put out a project, there's always people for or against a book. Especially so with the format they use... put out a book, and you might not get to revisit it for a few years, even if people really, really hate it. But then there are the books that people love, and hopefully they get to hear about those more.

One of their big problems is legacy issues. I mean look at what the 1e -> 2e has done with Malifaux. Tons of "why doesnt X do Y anymore?!" and GW has that over 6 editions now and an even greater number of models. But where Malifaux seems to have the freedom to remove some of the legacy issues, GW always seems very hesitant to do so. The biggest one I think being their turn order. I go, you go doesnt work with the GW army size. Oh good lord, nonono, please dont shoot me with literally your entire army before I get to go

I dont work in the industry so my completely uniformed opinion is probably right

....mnyep

---------- Post added at 08:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 AM ----------

And yeah, I do not envy the GW design team. They are still the largest company by far, even with this latest news. It's gotta be hard for them each time they put out a project, there's always people for or against a book. Especially so with the format they use... put out a book, and you might not get to revisit it for a few years, even if people really, really hate it. But then there are the books that people love, and hopefully they get to hear about those more.

One of their big problems is legacy issues. I mean look at what the 1e -> 2e has done with Malifaux. Tons of "why doesnt X do Y anymore?!" and GW has that over 6 editions now and an even greater number of models. But where Malifaux seems to have the freedom to remove some of the legacy issues, GW always seems very hesitant to do so. The biggest one I think being their turn order. I go, you go doesnt work with the GW army size. Oh good lord, nonono, please dont shoot me with literally your entire army before I get to go

Justin, who's the irritating kid in the Malifaux class of 2014?

ohgoditsmeisntit

Justin, who's the irritating kid in the Malifaux class of 2014?

ohgoditsmeisntit

Justin, who's the irritating kid in the Malifaux class of 2014?

Justin, who's the irritating kid in the Malifaux class of 2014?

What about tea?

VVVVVVVVVVVVV Passion for tea, but that works too

What about tea?

VVVVVVVVVVVVV Passion for tea, but that works too

Nids are the Cuddle Codex! Its probably canon! Carnifex just want hugs!

Nids are the Cuddle Codex! Its probably canon! Carnifex just want hugs!

I just wanted nids to be fun with options.... its all I wanted! They didnt even have to be good! Just fun!

I just wanted nids to be fun with options.... its all I wanted! They didnt even have to be good! Just fun!

I see nothing wrong with this.

I think the Dev team should have a responsibility to be answerable to someone, even if its the rest of the Dev team. As I understand it Cruddace answers to nobody.

I see nothing wrong with this.

I think the Dev team should have a responsibility to be answerable to someone, even if its the rest of the Dev team. As I understand it Cruddace answers to nobody.

Justin: do not go to GW, you are too good at rules development to waste in on space barbies.

I was fairly disappointed with the new GW nid models even. Last edition things like Venomthropes (despite being wobbly as hell) and Hive Guard we're very cool models. The Exocrine doesnt do it for me. Nor does the Harpy double box, but I made winged Carnifexes 2 editions ago, so I guess I just prefer mine? Either way, I need more to drop 70 bucks on a box

Justin: do not go to GW, you are too good at rules development to waste in on space barbies.

I was fairly disappointed with the new GW nid models even. Last edition things like Venomthropes (despite being wobbly as hell) and Hive Guard we're very cool models. The Exocrine doesnt do it for me. Nor does the Harpy double box, but I made winged Carnifexes 2 editions ago, so I guess I just prefer mine? Either way, I need more to drop 70 bucks on a box