TurboNitroMonkey

A couple questions came up in tonight's game, both relating to Lilith's upgrade Beckon Malifaux, which reads: Illusionary Forest: Place two 50mm Illusionary Forest Markers within range and touching each other. These Markers are treated as Ht 4 terrain with the dense, severe & soft cover traits. Remove these Markers the next time this Crew takes this Action. Can it be placed on top of/under/overlapping an existing model's base? When Lilith is killed, do the Illusionary Forest Markers go away?

yI neglected to read Rapid Growth before posting. Making my original post knee-jerk and worthless. Consider it redacted and this replacement post my mark of shame.

Fair enough. Thank you.

Thankye kindly.

Impossible to Wound: Damage flips against this model suffer [-]. Damage flips against this model man not be cheated. (I Need to learn how to pop in the icons)

Kaeris managed to drop an Immolate Pyre Marker on top of Teddy tonight, and we had a question about the interaction between Hazardous Terrain vs Impossible to Wound. My thought was that all damage flips vs Teddy take a negative flip, regardless of source, so long as its a damage flip. My opponent thinks that only applies to damage flips originating from enemy attacks, and never from terrain. Should Teddy have taken a straight 1/2/4 damage flip? or flip two take the lowest?

I found this discussion: http://www.wyrd-games.net/showthread.php?46544-2e-Can-a-Rotten-Belle-s-Lure-be-used-on-models-already-in-base-to-base&highlight=lure But while touching on the topic pretty directly, it never seemed to come to a full conclusion. Sorry if its thread necro, but this came up in a game tonight, and will likely come up again: In this case, Baby Kade cast Lure on a nearby enemy model in order to set up Teddy for the evil that he does. So I moved his model towards, past and around Kade, leaving him in base-to-base with Kade, but on the opposite side. To illustrate. (Enemy), (Kade), (Teddy) (E) (K) (T) became (K)(E) (T) and not (E)(K) (T) Due to the wording of Lure, I believe that I could in fact walk my opponents model AROUND my model and end him in base to base, as it does not dictate how it is moved, nor even that it moves in a manner that makes it continuously get closer, only that it ends as close as possible. My opponent thought it was cheesy shenanigans. I too think its cheesy shenanigans, but evil, devious, satisfying, intended and legal cheesy shenanigans. Rules as written, it seems clean to me. Rules as intended doesn't just feel like 'come hither' but 'go where I say you go'. Thoughts? And of course if I missed an Errata, or an obvious derp moment in the rulebook, please point it out.