-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Articles
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by RooBudy
-
-
4 minutes ago, solkan said:
Did you write these words deliberately trying to get placed on an ignore list, or is that an accident?
I don’t understand? I am just asking for a page number or quote that backs up your statement. Is that not ok to do?
i haven’t played many games of M3E and I remember triggers saying add blast in m2e not “suffers blast damage” which to me are different things. If I am remembering incorrectly then I apologise but I am just trying to get clarification
-
1 minute ago, solkan said:
What the words "Target suffers +" mean is that you add a to the result of the damage flip against the target. Doing so causes the Blasts rules to apply and as a result you place a Blast marker.
If you feel that this is unclear or confusing, please feel free to complain or ask questions.
Does it say anywhere that add blast dmg means add marker or is that just an assumption based on m2e.
I not trying to complain? I am just looking for clarification. Because the way it’s worded seems like a way to increase the dmg of an attack. However if it says somewhere that it adds a marker then that’s fine and seems more balanced.
-
Are you sure it adds a blast maker. The trigger says that the model suffers blast damage. If it was adding a blast marker wouldn’t it say as much. You are probably right I just want to know the justification behind your argument as I read it as the additional damage with no maker.
Sweeping strike trigger??
in Malifaux Rules Discussion
Posted
Thank you for clarifying. I have also been looking at other cards and they all seem to be worded the same. When asking this question I assumed that there was a trigger that said “add blast” like in m2e but now I see this is the new version of add blast and is just worded differently.