folletrap

Here a step by step guide for you:

1)buy 4 of the new ones

2) send me 2 of the oldones and 2 of the new ones

3) accept my deepest thanks

4)enjoy malifaux!

ok, I suspected this can be the reason I can find anything...but want to be sure about my Search-Fu.
Thanks for the prompt answer.

Can someone tell me where I can find the winners of the iron painters secondary prizes? I searched the forum but found nothing.
I received a message which says I win a price (so kneel before my magnificence!!) but don't tell me for WHAT i won...and I also curios about the other winners

TY

ps: Dear Megan Fox, now that I'm a winner would you love me?

He would have no reason to, but if he does, CCK could pick the upgrade up and use it. Tricking your opponent into doing that would be quite poor sportsmanship in my opinion though.

not intended to be tricky (I always tell my opponents what could happen if...) maybe my opponent can have a plan, be a real sportive... More simply: I wanted to know if Benjoewoo's idea was right TY Myraä

but what if the attacker choses to damage Seamus first?

You are.

This kind of answers add nothing. A little explaination would be nice.

 

Focused +1: This model may remove this Condition when declaring an Action to gain a number of   to the Action's duel and damage flip equal to the value of the Focused Condition removed.

mmm, the condition explicity says that you can remove focus to gain  to the action's duel and damage. So I assume that you can use (remove) it only if the action causes a duel and (and/or?) damage. A walk action doesn't do duel or causes damage. So IMO you can't use focus on a walk action.

PS: RAW the action on which you apply the focus must causes duel AND damages. But I can be wrong

again not sure:

pp35 of the small book:

resolving actions: [...]

The player begins announcing what Action the model is taking...

So: player declares the action and model spend AP...usually tose concide. but with obey the two things split.

(player of) zoraida declares the action by obey, the target performs it

Part of performing an action is decalring it.  its step one of the steps, Declare action and spend AP,  so yes you get to draw from bewitch.

not sure: the Obeying model is declaring the action, not the one being obeyed, which happens to be the one Bewitched, so the target of the obey is not making a declaration to trigger the card draw

in fact while under obey you don't spend your AP...and you don't spend AP because you don't declare (IMO)

IMO bewitch is more a "control" action: it's thinked to reduces the opponent's choices not to make you draw all your deck . But maybe I'm wrong

Wyrdos I need your help to resolve a doubt that emerged yesterday while gaming. Zoraida vs Seamus (great game btw  )

Zoraide used "Bewitch" on a model and the use "Obey" on the same model. Is Zoraida allowed to draw 2 cards by bewitch? The doubt borns because Bewitch says that the model must "declare..." but with obey the model doesn't declare action
Here the rules:


Obey: target non-leader model immediately performs one (1) Action chosen and controlled by this model controller. A model which performed an Attack due to Obey may not be targeted by Obey again duiring the same activation.

Bewitch: target enemy model gains the following condition until the end of it's next activation: "Bewitched: Every time this model declares a Walk, Charge or Attack Action wich was not generated by a Charge, the model which applied this condition may draw two cards"

 

the first one...i'm speechless