Barnaberible
-
Posts
382 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Articles
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by Barnaberible
-
-
I didn't get chance to read the threads I posted I just dug them out, i think the last one you posted Da O&F was from 1.5 rules before the edition change
I thought it was generally agreed she did need Los but I could be wrong, only on mobile at minute so will need to have a look later
-
-
Well, poison/burning there is logic in not giving credit to the model. first, multiple models can give it out to the same model at the same time, so that it becomes nightmarish to track,
This is a very good point
-
There is another thread for this somewhere and it was also discussed on twitter
I think the gist of it was she needs line of sight to declare the charge (as per the rules) as her card dosent say otherwise and then after she has declared the charge she is charging and ignores terrain etc.
so yes, she does need line of sight for diving charge
-
Is there an acctual ruling for any type of indirect kill credit in M2E yet? (lure/push-falling, poison, burning etc)
Personally I always thought the 1.5 ruling of 'you didnt kill that model the poison did' was a bit lame. Id like to see all death accredited to the model that caused the death / gave the condition etc
-
yes well I suppose it dosent say the leader must be in play, or even alive for that matter, but I am thinking this was the intention. Or was it the ace up Justins & Mack's sleeve to make the Malifaux Child useful?
-
So I presume you are going to use bettes 'one with the night' to bury Tara and then use the child's 'just like you' to cast 'faces in the void' from Tara?
The question is can you cast just like you using one of Tara's spells if she is buried as technically she is not in play
-
Wait wha-
woooah.
Tara can do much the same thing. Think I'll be running Bishop with her now.
And Pandora...
Thanks a lot for pointing this out.
Tara can also give him fast, bury him and then drop him on top of someone with a potential six attacks!
-
so the question is...has anyone ever pulled it off or had it done to them?
I'm not so sure I'd want to hold onto a high crow and a mod/severe damage card in a Tara crew just on the off chance that my opponent black jokered the defence flip and had no hand left.
thematically though its great, love it
-
that sounds like a more practical interpretation, a ruling in the FAQ would be useful
-
.
Personally im gutted because out of the list above I have the Hanged and Hamelin.
Hanged I can't do anything with other than play casual if my opponent doesn't object.
Hamelin I scratch built/sculted his base and I have no intention of runing a Hamlin crew
I am in exactly the same boat (although I havnt built hamelin yet) and an a bit narked that I cant use my hanged (especially as I dont own a regular sculpt)
Sure, I would be able to use it in friendly club games as I'm pretty sure it wont actually make that much difference in game terms, but I can completely understand how it may be questioned in tournaments.
and no, you cant re base it, its completely impossible without somehow building a greenstuff column for it to stand on!
-
-
Thanks for the suggestion. I just picked one up on ebay
I will call him Havana, he looks like a cuban cigar smoker eh?
you might have even bought it off me, I sent one out to Chicago last week (I had 2 and the Hannah sculpt from TTB coming, Hannah overload here)
-
Yes, and they take damaged from falling but can travel vertically whenever they want (apparently!)
-
Wow an event on a saturday, put me down as interested please
-
Are the strategies for this being announced on the day?
-
my first suggestion would be Hannah to strip the built in suit for lure (it still requires a suit right? I dont have my book with me) It will be alot more difficult to get lure off without the built in suit
-
Has anyone looked at the Barker Zoza Aphid Frame Suit from Sedition Wars Kickstarter (loads on Ebay) as a proxy, looks like it might work but not sure of the scale
-
I've never considered it to have armour 2 as I dont see how it can be in base contact with itself, although I dont have my rulebook with me so have no way of proving this, its just how Ive always played it.
-
How is she OP? The only thing I see is that you can make things fast and unbury them and have them activate. Yeah thats pretty nasty but it can leave you massively over extended and very vulnerable. And also the fact that you can strip AP from things by making them slow.
As for the bury trigger its a WP13 resist and can only be used if there is nothing else buried, so in my mind its not as powerful as being Terrifying 13.
Her stats / damage are nothing special for a master
-
Now Paid
-
We should just open a vote on rules questions, it would be a lot simpler
-
Tara walks into a store...
I'd like an apple please
That will cost 3 cards
I don't have 3 cards, how about I give you all the cards I have
Ok
Wait a minute, you don't have any cards at all
Sale of goods act mate, how about you discuss it with my soulstone sword
Erm, just have the apple
-
But you are wrong.
Toot toot.
No I'm Not
Diving Charge question, needs LoS? Misaki
in Malifaux Rules Discussion
Posted
All replies in the first post seem to say she does need Los the way I read it.
Misaki's card states 'may ignore....when it takes a charge action'
The rules for actions pg 37 state step 1 declare action and spend ap, declare target, check los, take terrifying test etc.
So the question is; is declaring the charge action the same as taking the charge action, I would argue you declare it before you take it (after all if you fail the terrifying you won't be taking the charge)
The card states it may declare a charge action while engaged, so if it could ignore Los when charging would it not say ignore intervening models and terrain when declaring a charge action instead of when it takes a charge action?
Also the fact that LJ and Lilith cards specifically state they don't need Los while misaki's dosent would make me err on the side that she does.
But then again in 1.5 you didn't need Los for diving charge