Bloodlust of the masamune : When this model activates, its first Action MUST be a melee strike action targeting a model in this model's melee range, a charge action targeting the nearest enemy model. If this model does not take one of these two actions first during its activation, it suffers 2 Wd.
Really guys? I feel like we're not taking a step forward on the whole wording stuff clearly front. what does the above mean.
A. The victorias must take an attack against a model in melee or charge a model. (which can fail, and then end their activation)
B. The victorias may not do either of those things, and instead take 2 wds.
C. The victorias must take an attack against a model in melee or charge a model, and take 2 wounds and lose the activation if the charge fails
The fact this even has to be asked $$$$$$$$es me off because I do see other improvements in how the books are being written rule clarity wise, specifically the whole AR: bit.
Question
Dolomyte
Bloodlust of the masamune : When this model activates, its first Action MUST be a melee strike action targeting a model in this model's melee range, a charge action targeting the nearest enemy model. If this model does not take one of these two actions first during its activation, it suffers 2 Wd.
Really guys? I feel like we're not taking a step forward on the whole wording stuff clearly front. what does the above mean.
A. The victorias must take an attack against a model in melee or charge a model. (which can fail, and then end their activation)
B. The victorias may not do either of those things, and instead take 2 wds.
C. The victorias must take an attack against a model in melee or charge a model, and take 2 wounds and lose the activation if the charge fails
The fact this even has to be asked $$$$$$$$es me off because I do see other improvements in how the books are being written rule clarity wise, specifically the whole AR: bit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
12 answers to this question
Recommended Posts