SteveinNYC Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 I was playing Guild v Guild yesterday and my opponent had a newer Judge card than mine (his Judge's card has 2/4/5 Long Arm damage, mine reads 2/3/5). How can I find out which cards have changed? Can I compare the card to the book, or are there card changes that don't match up to the book? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tadaka Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 Other then a few have been posted here as changed you cant. Couple people on the forums have posted frustraition on the difficulty of getting details on whats the correct rules. So atm you can do a search for a card and see if some one mentioned a change. Other then that wait for the erata with the rest of us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Green Git Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 I was playing Guild v Guild yesterday and my opponent had a newer Judge card than mine (his Judge's card has 2/4/5 Long Arm damage, mine reads 2/3/5). How can I find out which cards have changed? Can I compare the card to the book, or are there card changes that don't match up to the book? You can look on the cards and see if it has a "V2" on the face somewhere... it will be small. Also, you can read the Errata and see which models have been modified. If so, then it *should* have a V2 card. Not saying it does yet but it should soon if it doesn't already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tadaka Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 Git the problem with that is the errata will not cover all the cards out. Many of the new sets have cards not covered by current errata. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Green Git Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Git the problem with that is the errata will not cover all the cards out. Many of the new sets have cards not covered by current errata. So are you saying cards have changed that are not covered in the Errata? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wodschow Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 So are you saying cards have changed that are not covered in the Errata? Well.. The V2 Errata featured on the newest cards haven't yet been released in PDF-form. Alot of people seem to be annoyed by this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Green Git Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Well.. The V2 Errata featured on the newest cards haven't yet been released in PDF-form. Can you give me an example of such a card? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wodschow Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Can you give me an example of such a card? Hmm..? Easy, this just came up in another thread for instance: http://wyrd-games.net/forum/showthread.php?p=184267#post184267 A few others were listed here: http://wyrd-games.net/forum/showthread.php?t=16132&highlight=errata+justice You can probably find even more by searching the forums a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Green Git Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 And with that we will now resume the thread already in progress. To get back to the OP's questions the book is older so you could have some V2 cards that are different than the book. The changes to the cards came after the first book was published. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oozeboss Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 A lot of people seem to be annoyed by this. Very Highly Annoyed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEiRD sKeTCH Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Very Highly Annoyed! And you shouldn't be any more as the V2 PDF has been posted... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wodschow Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Misplaced threadomancy.. huh? Edit: Well I suppose threadomancy almost always is.. But still! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.