dargrin Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Hi- Earlier today I posted some linked pictures of a miniature that I painted. In the posted I put a warning that they were of a nude female and not click if one was offended by such. The post has vanished. I checked this rules and feedback but didn't see anything that said no nudes. Did I miss something? In either case I wanted to see if there was a policy here in regards to such things. Hit me back. Dargrin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dargrin Posted September 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 (edited) Ah, just found it. Section 5 here: http://wyrd-games.net/forum/showpost.php?p=106&postcount=1 I am assuming that sexual nature also applies to figures as well. Sorry my bad. Edited September 3, 2010 by dargrin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchethead Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Zoraida's saggy gramma boobies notwithstanding. Sexy stuff! :whip: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dargrin Posted September 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Well mine was a bit more then that.:laughing: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supervike Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 I tried to see if it had been deleted, but I guess that's beyond my MOD capabilities.... But, now I WANNA see the pic in question...could you PM me a link to it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Madman Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Ah, just found it. Section 5 here: http://wyrd-games.net/forum/showpost.php?p=106&postcount=1 I am assuming that sexual nature also applies to figures as well. Sorry my bad. I saw it this morning... the quality of work was impressive however It's not a WYRD fig and has nothing to do with malifaux... I think more than anything, 4 detailed photos of the fig was a bit much to get the idea it was naked- moreover a direct full on shot of it's junk was completly unnecessary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icemantis99 Posted September 4, 2010 Report Share Posted September 4, 2010 The fact that its not a Wyrd fig has absolutely nothing to do with anything. I don't think it should have been taken down, personally, but I'm not admin, lol. My advice? Shoot a admin a pm, find out exactly what's up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ispep Posted September 4, 2010 Report Share Posted September 4, 2010 I'm sure it had nothing to do with it being a non-Wyrd mini. And they would have probably let it go if it were just a bare chest. The pic of the backside, with all its anatomical detail was probably the cause for its removal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peterdita Posted September 4, 2010 Report Share Posted September 4, 2010 Wyrd was a painting site long before malifaux was around and people have always been welcome to post any mini manufacturer they want. I've seen the fig and its very well done. But I missed the money shot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven28256 Posted September 4, 2010 Report Share Posted September 4, 2010 What mini was it? I'm curious now. But anyway, I thought that it was okay to post nude minis here. In fact, isn't there a category in the painting contests specifically for "naughty" minis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephengroy Posted September 4, 2010 Report Share Posted September 4, 2010 junk pls. If we weren't all adults, we couldn't afford them anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dargrin Posted September 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 If you need to know shoot me a PM and I will send you to were it is viewable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvatarForm Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 The fact that its not a Wyrd fig has absolutely nothing to do with anything. I don't think it should have been taken down, personally, but I'm not admin, lol. My advice? Shoot a admin a pm, find out exactly what's up. +1, if its well-painted, simply put a warning on the title [NSFW] or something. Kids are gonna look at what they wanna look at, its up to their parents to filter the home PC and Interwebs usage. Why do the rest of us suffer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephengroy Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Why do the rest of us suffer? Two words: Jessi Slaughter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchethead Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Two words: Jessi Slaughter Two more words: Brain slushy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Madman Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 The fact that its not a Wyrd fig has absolutely nothing to do with anything. I don't think it should have been taken down, personally, but I'm not admin, lol. My advice? Shoot a admin a pm, find out exactly what's up. I understand what you are saying, but I strongly disagree. Whatever WYRD was... it's now a parent of a game company and that requires Mature managment of their website Posting the mini is not the real issue, not with me anyway WHERE & How it was posted was it's an off-brand product that has nothing to do with the game discussions- period by posting it in the general forums section it appears to be nothing more then attention grabbing- the OP can deny it but the facts remain strong the poster could have just posted it in the gallery section with their disclaimer and little fuss would have been made but they didin't it was posted in the general section with no warnings It was taken down in a timley manner and I applaude the Mods for doing a stand up job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icemantis99 Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 I agree with that. Didn't know it was. posted in the general forums, but OP says he put a disclaimer on it. I didn't see the original post, so I cant say anything. I do think a mod or admin. should have sent a message explaining why they deleted the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts