Jump to content
AndreyF

Bugs, requests & other feedback

Recommended Posts

In local games (haven't been able to test network), Insignificant models can be selected for schemes. I've tried it with the Printing Press and Trained Raptor, and my opponent a couple days ago did it with the Eternal Flame. He's new and didn't realize it was Insignificant, so he used it as his Claim Jump target.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one request. Could you add a way to filter when you search by keyword what you are looking for. For example, search only on rules, only on positions, only on keywords..... For the filter, can you add a way to choose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An idea that ome of my friends had the other day was that it would be really cool if certain crews/models started with conditions/token on them, as opposed to having to manually search for them every game. What specifically prompted this was the Monk keyword, and needing to start every game by manually putting Chi +1 on each model. If instead all models with Enlightenment could start with the Chi +0 condition at the start of the game it would be very convient. Similarly, if models with Power Converter (Hoff crew) could all start with Power +0, and all of Lynch's models, or models in a game with Lynch, could start with Brilliance +0 (or +X if they are Succumbed), or even if all models on both crews in a game where Kaeris is a leader could start with Burning +0. I get that its probably real complicated to implement, but it was a cool idea so I figured Id post it here

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty good app, but it can be better.

I have some suggestions:

1. After the checkbox of model activation has been checked, automatically remove Conditions that end at the End of Activation.

2. After increasing the Turn number:

2.1. Automatically count the amount of Pass Tokens. You can display the previous amount that may be needed to determine the initiative in parentheses.

2.2. Automatically remove Conditions that end at the End Phase.

2.3. Optional (can be disable in the settings) automatically deal damage to models with Poison/Burning.

2.4. Optional (can be disable in the settings) confirmation of the increase Turn number.

3. Fix swipe to flip the front/rear of the model's card. Now you need to draw exactly horizontally to flip the card. A little movement vertically opens the next/previous card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/5/2019 at 8:31 PM, Xekros said:

In local games (haven't been able to test network), Insignificant models can be selected for schemes. I've tried it with the Printing Press and Trained Raptor, and my opponent a couple days ago did it with the Eternal Flame. He's new and didn't realize it was Insignificant, so he used it as his Claim Jump target.

I reported this before, but their was no useful responce!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found a bug in schemes chosen for games which require you to pick models. Vendetta, Claim Jump, Take prisoner all have this issue, and I'm not sure if any other schemes have you pick a model.

When a crew contains more than one of the same minion, during game setup you can pick a specific model (Eg: Ruffian, Ruffian 2, Ruffian 3).  Once the game is started checking the scheme will just show "Ruffian" even if you picked 2 or 3.  This causes an out-of-game issue when you have to convince your opponent which model you picked at the start of the game. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A QoL request: Would it be possible to add a copy/paste options for Crews tab to be able to reposition them faster? Right now if you have a good list stack and want to move several of them, it takes time to drag them from 1 point of the list to the other. If this could be done with several of them at the same time it'd be great (some way to select more than 1 crew before running a command)

The ideal functionality for me would be the following: Select a few crews (let's say 4) in different positions, click in the new "Copy/Paste" option, go to the desired location and there click in the "Paste" option (in the pop-up menu of a crew), these 4 crews are moved just under that crew.

Awesome App btw!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff, this app is very useful!

One request/wish for future would be to incorporate a tournament organizer either within this app or as a standalone but integrated app.  Tournament app could preset game settings and attendees could each connect to the tournament through their m3e app to add crews, etc.  If players don't wish to use the app during their games they would need to be able to have their scores input manually after the game.  Would also appreciate an allowance made for tournaments with other scoring categories to be counted such as sportsmanship and paint scoring.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mach_5 said:

Great stuff, this app is very useful!

One request/wish for future would be to incorporate a tournament organizer either within this app or as a standalone but integrated app.  Tournament app could preset game settings and attendees could each connect to the tournament through their m3e app to add crews, etc.  If players don't wish to use the app during their games they would need to be able to have their scores input manually after the game.  Would also appreciate an allowance made for tournaments with other scoring categories to be counted such as sportsmanship and paint scoring.

Other people have requested similar things before. If Wyrd doesn't want to do this as part of the official apps, maybe I'll do something on my own in my spare time (though I'd likely have to charge for it to make it worth it at that point :\).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, dzlier said:

Other people have requested similar things before. If Wyrd doesn't want to do this as part of the official apps, maybe I'll do something on my own in my spare time (though I'd likely have to charge for it to make it worth it at that point :\).

I mean there's other apps out there for tournament organizing, including some free stuff, but having one that's as easy to use as the m3e app, can push out game setups to the players for use in their apps, track VP differentials etc, and even record the masters/crews players use for people to look back at after the event would be a huge.  If it doesn't integrate with the m3e app to allow automatic reporting of all that extra possible data while games are played then any of the other solutions already out there would suffice.   

 

If you can do all that I'd pay a small amount (I don't run tournaments to run a profit obviously), but I feel it's something Wyrd could offer it's henchman at some point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if it's been suggested (or if I'm just missing how to do it), but how about the idea of allowing people to exceed points cost?

Essentially, allow me to create, for example, a 60-70pt list, including all my common options (like a condition removal model, or a specific model for certain schemes, or both a Rider and another beater I'll choose between once I see the board), and then delete them, rather than have a core 20-30pt crew, and then have to remember what stuff I'll be wanting to add. Or have the option to deselect, without deleting, making it more useful for resetting between games.

Have the SS display in a different color, and have Cache read as "ILLEGAL", so that people know to adjust before playing.

I know I could up the Max SS section, to allow a bigger build, but then it screws with Cache after I've removed stuff. For example, if I set it at 60 (the maximum it'll allow), and make a 58SS crew, and I remove 12SS of models, the Cache reads 10 instead of 4). Also, if I forget it's at 60, I might play a game illegally. 

I've been building crews, and putting that information in the notes of what to add, but I'd rather have them in the crew, in case I forget to read the notes. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one seeing a startup crash with the latest Android version?

Quote

2019-11-23 14:15:25.204 6347-6384/? A/libc: Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1, fault addr 0x8 in tid 6384 (1.ui)
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG: *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG: Build fingerprint: 'Muffler/taimen/taimen:7.1.2/NOF26V/4565141:user/release-keys'
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG: Revision: '0'
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG: ABI: 'x86_64'
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG: pid: 6347, tid: 6384, name: 1.ui  >>> com.wyrd.m3e <<<
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG: signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault addr 0x8
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     rax 00007595f4d06f51  rbx 0000000000000001  rcx 00005fb446260cb0  rdx 00005fb446263128
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     rsi 00005fb4462631b8  rdi 00005fb446263268
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     r8  0000000000000000  r9  00005fb446260d28  r10 00007595ded01169  r11 0000000000000009
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     r12 00005fb4462631b8  r13 00007595e0bed520  r14 00005fb446260d28  r15 00007595e0bf0638
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     cs  0000000000000033  ss  000000000000002b
2019-11-23 14:15:25.263 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     rip 00007595df4459f0  rbp 00007595e0102858  rsp 00007595e0102758  eflags 0000000000010202
2019-11-23 14:15:25.264 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG: backtrace:
2019-11-23 14:15:25.264 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     #00 pc 00000000000039f0  /data/app/com.wyrd.m3e-1/lib/x86_64/libapp.so (offset 0x1000) (_kDartVmSnapshotInstructions+10736)
2019-11-23 14:15:25.264 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     #01 pc 000000000069b242  /data/app/com.wyrd.m3e-1/lib/x86_64/libflutter.so (offset 0x293000)
2019-11-23 14:15:25.264 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG:     #02 pc 0c0c0c0c08080807  <unknown>
2019-11-23 14:15:25.571 6390-6390/? A/DEBUG: pid: 6347, tid: 6384, pkg name: com.wyrd.m3e
2019-11-23 14:15:25.571 2052-2219/com.bluestacks.BstCommandProcessor D/BstCommandProcessor-Application: Application crash has been observed. 
2019-11-23 14:15:25.582 1859-1877/system_process I/BootReceiver: Copying /data/tombstones/tombstone_00 to DropBox (SYSTEM_TOMBSTONE)
2019-11-23 14:15:25.583 1859-6396/system_process W/ActivityManager:   Force finishing activity com.wyrd.m3e/.MainActivity
2019-11-23 14:15:25.595 1859-6396/system_process W/ActivityManager: Exception thrown during pause
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The annoying thing is that's what's happening even if I create a new google account, and a fresh device image.  :( 

Edit:  Really bizarrely:

  • App launches properly in Blue Stacks running in Windows 10 emulated in Parallels Desktop
  • App does not launch in Blue Stacks running directly in OS X.
  • App did not not launch on actual LGL62VL phone yesterday
  • App does launch on LGL62VL phone when I try it just now.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, dzlier said:

So is it working now or is it still crashing?

It's working on the real device.  Apparently that was just a fluke problem.

Still having issues trying to launch it on Blue Stacks, which is weird since it had been running properly earlier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, solkan said:

It's working on the real device.  Apparently that was just a fluke problem.

Still having issues trying to launch it on Blue Stacks, which is weird since it had been running properly earlier.

Yeah no idea about that. When I use an emulator I run the one through Android Studio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We ran into a bit of a bug yesterday. Tried to set up a Network Henchman Hardcore game, but one of us accidently clicked out. He rejoined the lobby, but it couldnt let me (who never left) confirm my faction. Then I left and rejoined and it wouldnt let HIM confirm his faction. So we both left and made a new lobby and it worked fine.

Also there's an error when looking at the schemes in Henchman Hardcore. I guess because there's only 2 schemes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Mycellanious said:

We ran into a bit of a bug yesterday. Tried to set up a Network Henchman Hardcore game, but one of us accidently clicked out. He rejoined the lobby, but it couldnt let me (who never left) confirm my faction. Then I left and rejoined and it wouldnt let HIM confirm his faction. So we both left and made a new lobby and it worked fine.

Also there's an error when looking at the schemes in Henchman Hardcore. I guess because there's only 2 schemes?

I've seen this a couple times, usually solved if you close the game (without leaving) and then open it back up again. Not sure the exact cause.

Also what do you mean by "error" and "when looking at schemes?" Hard to know what to look for without more information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a quick question, is there a randomized for who is the Attacker? I only ask because since we started using the app in 100% of our cases, whomever created the game is listed as the attacker. We were just wondering if we were on an oddity of the curve, or if it was just default that whomever creates the game is the attacker. 

Thank You.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Fetid Strumpet said:

Had a quick question, is there a randomized for who is the Attacker? I only ask because since we started using the app in 100% of our cases, whomever created the game is listed as the attacker. We were just wondering if we were on an oddity of the curve, or if it was just default that whomever creates the game is the attacker. 

Thank You.

In all my games, it has always set to which device is being viewed from.   We have just been flipping for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Fetid Strumpet said:

That hasn’t been our experience. We still see Attacker defender set the same regardless of the device it’s viewed on. It just has universally been whomever creates the game is the attacker.

 

Its been randomized for us. I make the game every time but I've been both attacker and defender. Android btw if that matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information