Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sullie00

What I hope 3rd Ed WON'T be.

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately, I will not be able to participate in the Beta for 3rd edition because this is the busy season for my second job. However, the more I listen to my friends talk about how it looks like 3rd Ed is meant to streamline and simplify the more anxious I become. This was the same them I heard about Age of Sigmar… There were just "too many rules" and it was difficult to play the game. Now, AoS is so easy to play that every game I've ever played was decided in Turn 2. I play Malifaux because it is unique, fluff-oriented/driven, and every piece is an individual that has strengths and weaknesses. I understand that war games are hard to balance. However, I really hope this game keeps its identity. I LOVE the fact that when I look at a card there are fun little half references and cute little jokes (See Teddy's HUG+Peek-a-Boo or the Spanish names for Ortega abilities). For those that would make the argument "... (random ability/action) is broken!" YES! It is broken! But so are the mechanics of almost every other crew if you know what you're doing!!! That's the entire point of this game. It allows YOU as the player to find your own individualized play-style and tell everyone else "Bring it ON!" I truly hope that this game does not lose its unique identity in a world full of games that have cookie-cutter factions with no soul (War-Machine, Hordes, WH Fantasy, WH 40k, etc.). Feel free to diss me if you disagree I don't really care anyway. My entire point is that I love this game because I DON'T have to be like anyone else.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I'm not extremely anxious right now, I fully understand the fears of the OP.

I started Malifaux as a reaction to Warhammer 40k 8th Edition totally ruining the game by streamlining and trying to make it more accessible. In reality they made it a mockery of its previous self with the only thing really determines the outcome of a game is the amount of dice you're able to roll and re-roll or the number of Mortal Wounds you can inflict.

Malifaux is a completely different animal - and I love it. Yes, it is challenging to enter and even more so to become a really good player. As a henchman my hands are always full with the newcomers and their questions - which I love as well. That's why I volunteered to hench in the first place.

 

As mentioned before: I'm not really worried about 3rd since there is no real information available. But I would be very disappointed if Malifaux became a game like so many others where it doesn't really matter what faction you're playing since everything is only a copy&paste. 

If Wyrd (and the selected few in the closed beta) can pull it off and make the game easier to access but keep its tactical depth, the psychological elements as well as the variety of options then everyone wins. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having been through all this with the last edition change it was certainly possible to simplify and streamline the model cards, and the rules, whilst retaining a lot of the story inherent on the cards. If you look at Marcus I would say there was a chunk of fluff lost between first and second, but possibly some gained ( or just changed) between second and the gencon version. 

So if you're happy with the M2e level of fluff and reference then it seems it's looking fine. ( I still miss Hoffman being able to hire copplius just because of the inspiration for him)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@sullie00 I strongly support your statement and this is exactly what worries me too. I dont mind that much that some masters die and others are reallocated to other factions TBH, even though the master I have played the most over the last two years is Ramos and I have spent a lots of time painting constructs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not worried at the moment as we don´t know the rules yet. Streamline and simplify don´t have to mean "making the game less tactical". 

One of the problems I and my group have with the game is that there is so many rules for each model that games are sometimes won and lost because you forgot an ability or someone read an ability wrong. So if if you have 5 abilities that do essential the same thing but each have their own little twist it would be wise to add them together into one ability that does the same on every model. It will make the "forgetting and misreading" aspect less important and more games is won because of good playing. I know you will learn the game in the end, but for casual and new players the huge number of abilities that essential do the same thing is making the game less enjoyable. Also removing less used abilities or less essential abilities form a model will also remove some noise. I have good faith in this aspect of "Streamline and simplify" but time will tell.
 

  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I try not to be too negative toward GW, because if people enjoy it that good for them and I find 40k tournaments are a great way to get people to consider other games. That said, looking at what GW did in a similar situation and worrying about another company being that bad at writing rules is probably being excessively pessimistic. 

Simplifying and streamlining is probably a good thing, if done well. AoS was not really a simplification, it was starting anew with an entirely different game. 40k 8th edition is more enjoyable (and popular as far as I can tell) than 7th. 8th is mostly awful for the same reasons as 7th was (rules being an unbalanced mess), but at least the game isn't such a pain to play. 

Which is what "streamlining and simplification" is about; when done well. It's about minimising the things that one has to do in order to play a game, but that are not part of the fun we're after. Things like measuring, looking up rules, learning rules and making lists (fine and fuzzy line between fun and chore there). Like peeling fruit isn't what you're looking for, but you need to get past it. 

More rules don't make a game better; good rules do. The easier it is to get to actual playing and resolve things the better. 

  • Like 3
  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to agree with DarkBlack. AoS is not a simplification on Warhammer, it's an entirely new game with a loose story connection. My guess is that Malifaux will still be Malifaux, hopefully with less anooying stuff like 200 abilities that do the exact same thing with slightly different wordings leading to endless timing discussions. There's been a few sneak peaks of cards and while Marcus looked very different he didn't look "dumbed down" in any way. The charge stat going away and everything going by your move value for example is a lot less book-keeping for a pretty small difference in the actual game. The new way charge works will be different and require other tactics but will not really a simplification, more of a step sideways. Models still have soulstone costs on the new cards so it won't be AoS. :D 

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/12/2018 at 10:13 AM, Ravenard said:

i hope for more "spanish named" abilities for my Ortega. 

buy/print them in spanish.. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×