Seems like a simple question, but I wanted to ask anyway after it game up in a game
Mysterious Emissary with the Primeval Conflux upgrade uses "The Seasons of Change" on Titania, giving her the Armor +1 Condition until the end of the turn. Titania herself already has Royal Indignation. She's attacked by a minion that would normally do 3 damage.
Does she take 1, because the Royal Indignation would come into play first, then she takes 1 because armor can't reduce it to 0?
Or does she take 0, because the Armor would reduce it to 2, and then Royal Indignation would reduce it to 0 because it can?
The rationale would be useful. Is it a matter of an attackers activation deciding what order simultaneous things happen, or the models owner, or what?
Question
Philosfr
Seems like a simple question, but I wanted to ask anyway after it game up in a game
Mysterious Emissary with the Primeval Conflux upgrade uses "The Seasons of Change" on Titania, giving her the Armor +1 Condition until the end of the turn. Titania herself already has Royal Indignation. She's attacked by a minion that would normally do 3 damage.
The rationale would be useful. Is it a matter of an attackers activation deciding what order simultaneous things happen, or the models owner, or what?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.