New Outcast Master upgrades?

[Veefy]

Von Schill:
1) Gives you an Enemy Target condition that auto-applies to anyone you attack and damge that gives your models with Oathkeeper +flips on all duels against the damaged model until their next activation.  A 0-action also lets you target a friendly Freikorps model and attach Oathkeeper to them (no restrictions apply) if there are two or fewer models in your crew with Oathkeeper currently on them.  

2) Lets you target enemies pushed or placed within 6" of VS with a Clockwork Pistol shot (with a free plus flip), lets you split Charge actions against any models in range, and also gives you an amusing Clockwork punch attack that does minor damage BUT has an auto-trigger to place the target within 6" of VS.  The combo is pretty clearly called out on the card by the Arm's power name.  ;-)

 

My friend used this upgrade to get a free shot against models I summoned within his 6 inch bubble. I called shenanigans... My action is not "placing" a model, it is "summoning" one. We played it his way. Who was correct?

[Raimu]

4 hours ago, Veefy said:

Von Schill:
1) Gives you an Enemy Target condition that auto-applies to anyone you attack and damge that gives your models with Oathkeeper +flips on all duels against the damaged model until their next activation.  A 0-action also lets you target a friendly Freikorps model and attach Oathkeeper to them (no restrictions apply) if there are two or fewer models in your crew with Oathkeeper currently on them.  

2) Lets you target enemies pushed or placed within 6" of VS with a Clockwork Pistol shot (with a free plus flip), lets you split Charge actions against any models in range, and also gives you an amusing Clockwork punch attack that does minor damage BUT has an auto-trigger to place the target within 6" of VS.  The combo is pretty clearly called out on the card by the Arm's power name.  ;-)

 

My friend used this upgrade to get a free shot against models I summoned within his 6 inch bubble. I called shenanigans... My action is not "placing" a model, it is "summoning" one. We played it his way. Who was correct?

Summoning is not placing, you were right. Also he gives Oathkeeper for (1), not (0).

[Zebo]

Actually, summonig IS placing. In fact, the rulebook point summonig and unburying as the most common ways of placing. 

[apes-ma]

1 hour ago, Zebo said:

Actually, summonig IS placing. In fact, the rulebook point summonig and unburying as the most common ways of placing. 

So he will get a free shot against a summoned model? That's pretty cool actually!

[Raimu]

7 hours ago, Zebo said:

Actually, summonig IS placing. In fact, the rulebook point summonig and unburying as the most common ways of placing. 

My bad, checked the rules about placement and summoning, you are right. So unengaged Von Schill has nice antisummon bubble now, great.