Jump to content

so_diogenes

Vote Enabled
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    344

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by so_diogenes

  1. so_diogenes
    TT has easy access to focus+2 to negate the penalty to attacking him.
  2. so_diogenes

    Henchman thoughts

    so_diogenes replied to Gray0156's topic in UK

    Pretty sure the reward is building a community of folks with whom you get to play a game that you love, which you don't need an official program to do. If you like the game so much that you want to build a community around it, do it. If you just want free stuff, maybe don't.
  3. so_diogenes
    In GG17 I was playing a tournament with Arcanists and was at the top table for the final round. I had a Silent One as my frame for murder target. She got killed on turn 3 by my Resser opponent's Archie (a henchman, would have been a full 3 VP) and I just failed to announce it or give myself any points. I lost 5-3 and wound up in 4th place when I should have won 6-5 and won the tournament as the match containing the next 2 players tied.
  4. so_diogenes
    Where'd you get the info about the schemes and strats for the event? I'll be there too and I can't seem to find where they posted that
  5. so_diogenes
    Agreed, but it's not my complaint (see sandeep thread, page 8ish I think) I was just coming up with a way to address it. In other threads (and maybe that one too) people have talked about using a cheat sheet to mark off which of his actions have been taken via beacon both for when they're playing against and as a Sandeep crew.
  6. so_diogenes
    Instead of adding the to arcane storm or making it so that actions taken by beacon can't declare triggers, what about making it so only tactical actions or only attack actions could be used by beacon? It seems like a common complaint is that people can't keep track of what sandeep players models can do, I think this could simplify that a bit.
  7. so_diogenes
    I completely agree that it isn't much of a limiting factor. In my limited experience playing Sandeep it was never an issue to me (I play Neverborn almost exclusively now except the occasional practice game as another faction), I was just trying to clarify what @WWHSD said based on my interpretation. I'm kind of coming in during a heated discussion and not really trying to derail it, but having played Sandeep I think it could alleviate some concerns people have to reduce the range of Beacon without taking much away from Sandeep himself who I don't believe is particularly OP on his own.
  8. so_diogenes
    I don't think he complained at all, I think he just was emphasizing that Someone else purported that he was claiming 12" was close which he clarifiied as
  9. so_diogenes
    He's saying if a table is sufficiently covered with terrain, it is very unlikely that there is not blocking terrain over a 12" line of sight.
  10. so_diogenes
    I believe you mean it seems.... Wyrd... I'll see myself out now.
  11. so_diogenes
    Why is your opponent picking their models after knowing your master? You should only be declaring what faction you're each playing when you build your crew.
  12. so_diogenes
    edited
  13. so_diogenes
    Well that's the root of your question isn't it? Is the comma separated clause essential? I believe it is and that's why the commas are grammatically incorrect. If they meant to target when the discard happens I would hope they would have said "Flesh and metal: At the start of this model's activation it may discard a card. Then, target other friendly non-leader in 6" may take a (1) action at the end of this model's activation."
  14. so_diogenes
    From an english perspective I don't think the second comma is correct. I've always played it to mean the discard happens at the start of the activation, then at the end of the activation a friendly non-leader model within 6" of the emissary's current position may take a (1) action. I don't think you can ignore the (at the end of this model's activation) part but maybe you can just consider the "if it does" to be equal to "then" So if you discard a card at the start of its activation a friendly non-leader model within 6" of where it ends its activation may take a (1) action
  15. so_diogenes
    Manos == @Mason ressurectionists illuminati confirmed
  16. so_diogenes
    That's how I've always played it, but I'm not sure that's correct. Sandeep would get the following condition: Radiance: Models which are damaged by one of this model's Attack Actions must discard a card after the current Action is resolved or gain the Burning +1 Condition. RAW I believe Sandeep's attack actions would cause burning+1 if the opponent doesn't discard a card regardless of who takes the action because the Attack Action is still "one of Sandeep's Attack Actions." In order for Sandeep's Attack Actions taken by other models to not be affected by the Radiance Condition I would think it should be written like this: Radiance: Models which are damaged by Attack Actions taken by this model must discard a card after the current Action is resolved or gain the Burning +1 Condition. Unless there's an FAQ that I'm neglecting here, I think the other models should still do the Radiance thing.
  17. so_diogenes
    I didn't want to be the first to say it, but this. That said the render looks amazing and I want to buy every bit of it.
  18. so_diogenes
    This page contains all pre-Jan2018 errata: https://www.wyrd-games.net/malifaux-faq-errata This post contains the Jan2018 errata: That covers all of it!
  19. so_diogenes
    Barbaros had an errata, original was listed as 30mm base size but is actually 40mm. Not game breaking because I think the box even came with the correct base size, just something to be aware of.
  20. so_diogenes
    That set is really freakin cool. Here's the pics I promised: https://imgur.com/a/iAuRY
  21. so_diogenes
    I think it depends a lot on the shape and the other bits of terrain around it, as well as where you place it. Is your board modular or is like a full static thing? I tend to keep my severe terrain around the 50-100mm size using bases to map out a basic shape and then add little curves or whatever as necessary and I place it on the table last so that way I have a feel for if it will actually come into play or not. I can take pics later if you'd like to see.
  22. so_diogenes

    2017 monthly painting

    Images added to a gallery album owned by so_diogenes in Members Albums Category

    March: Mei Feng, Arcane Emissary, Firestarter, 3 Rail Workers, 3 Fire Gamin, 3 Wind Gamin, 3 Ice Gamin, Mechanized Porkchop, Gunsmith, Kang, Emberling, Sensei Yu, Shenlong, 2 Peasants, 1 Beckoner, 3 Monks of High River, 3 Shastar Vidiya Gaurds, 1 Soulstone Miner, 1 Malifaux Raptor April: Rasputina, Sandeep Desai, Snow Storm, Kudra, Banasuva, Soulstone Miner, Wendigo May: McCabe (mounted, dismounted), 2 wastrels, Sidir, Dawn Serpent, Luna, Yan Lo, Chiaki, Izamu, Toshiro, 2 komainu, soul porter June: Cassandra, 2 Coryphee, 1 Samurai July: Colette, Carlos Vasquez, 1 Union Miner, 2 Performers, 2 Mannequins, 3 Mechanical Doves August: Anna Lovelace, The Valedictorian, Rail Golem, Parker Barrows, Mad Dog Brackett, Doc Mitchell, 1 Bandido, Kandara September: Hodgepodge Emissary, The Tooth, The Claw, The Fang, Gorar, Aeslin, Yin the Penangalan, 3 Sanctioned Spellcasters, 3 Terracotta Warriors, 2 Akaname, 2 Monks of Low River October: Zoraida, Bad Juju, Rusty Alyce, Miss Ery, Iggy, 2 Silurids, Bandersnatch, Will 'o the Wisps, Hollow Waif, Voodoo Doll November: Lilith, Barbaros, Mysterious Emissary, Yasunori December: Alt-Nekima, Emeline Bellerose, Dr. Dufresne, Lone Swordsman, Doppleganger, Mature Nephilim, Scion of the Void, Misaki
  23. so_diogenes
    IMG_0493.JPG

    From the album: 2017 monthly painting

  24. so_diogenes
    IMG_0492.JPG

    From the album: 2017 monthly painting

  25. so_diogenes
    IMG_0491.JPG

    From the album: 2017 monthly painting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

  I accept