jimmypompom

Yeah I can agree with those points for the most part. Obviously they're not identical especially when you get down into the nitty gritty details. I was thinking from a more overall picture. A general overview and how they feel to me. I would still say though there is more in common between them than zoraida or lucius compared to Collodi though.

I don't think that's the reason collodi went to DMH but I think nexus is the closest thing to a replacement for that play style. I think you've very much put collodi in a box there. Although collodi was a very good control obey type master like zoraida or lucius, that was by far not his only trick. The summons were quite important imo for instance. I think a testament to their differences is that all of them were neverborn masters and yet they all had their own place. I do agree that collodi has similarities with them. However, I would argue that nexus has a larger amount of similarities and has a similar feel for the reasons I gave in my last couple of posts. P.S. I'm not a big fan of collodi in m3e. He just feels a little lack luster. Which is why I'm so excited to see the rest of the cadmus crew.

Even the models look similar. With the 4 arms and the long robes.

This may just be me but is anyone else getting m2e collodi vibes. The manipulation of enemy models, the summoning, using nearby models to buff its actions. And strings and webs aren't miles apart either. One of the reasons I'm so excited to play her/it is because of their similarities (collodi was my favourite master in 2nd edition). I feel like there's a link there but like I said it could just be me.