canopytheory

ouch! Hey I appreciate you clearing it up for me though. It is what it is. I dont like it but thats too bad for me I guess. hehe thanks guys

So I appreciate your reply, I havnt been playing for a year so forgive my ignorance. Just ran into this last night. To be clear the scenario was I smoked the stitched together and he remained in play with one wound. I put a fire wall infront of him. He activated with one wound and walked into the fire wall. He should suffer the wound and have had his activation end correct? Hence hes not invulnerable? thank you

What I find implausible is the idea that although not killed and remaining in play with one wound, that when activated with the one wound remaining that it is invulnerable? How do you figure? Durring the activation it has one wound and its ap to spend but where is it invulnerable? If it were to take damage durring its activation it would lose its remaining wound, "not die", and its activation would end till it could reactivate at the close. Invulnerable is nowhere in any explanation of the rule itself or any rule in the book.