Jonas Albrecht

...and call Flying Frog Productions, and see about collaborating with them on a Malifaux expansion for Shadows of Brimstone. That game owns, and a Malifaux otherworld expansion for it would be too perfect.

Stephanie Beatriz would be perfect for Perdita Ortega. She's already playing a character with the same attitude on Brooklyn Nine Nine.

In a book, you can arrange information in a way that's easier to use than you can on a smaller card. Plus, for me, M2e's card layout is just plain ugly and wasteful. Trying to cover the larger gaps with art made it even worse.

I'd prefer something that takes advantage of a book layout as opposed to a card layout. Besides, if it's just larger cards in the book, I'm going to feel like I'm buying them twice.

Man, I'm kinda torn about this one. I want a book, but not one that repeats the first book's card layout. Now, throw in the new model rules plus some story encounters or variants, and that would be great.

Done!

We really need to have a Facebook group for this area. Just like those dirty Chicagoans.

Scale mismatching bugs people. You can't sweep away the aesthetics issue and ask that people solely look at this from a rules standpoint when you're asking people to buy your toy solders. Hell, aesthetics is why I haven't been recommending the $40 M2e rulebook to anyone.

Gonna have to make my way to Bloomington some time soon.

I haven't gotten too many games in, but we've been playing at 45ss.

The problem, when it shows up, is not one of "This doesn't bother me", but a chorus of "This shouldn't bother you".

I'm pretty anti-clix games at this point.

Lasers?

Oh totally. I'm sure you can do narrative skirmish without a GM.

Good job winning, Mack.

Stuff like this is why I really miss the blogs. You could idea dump all day long without wondering if you were contributing to the site. Anyway, wayyyyy back in "tabletop wargaming" meant "losing to my friend's vampire warband in Mordheim", GW came out with a game called Inquisitor, that had large minis and WYSIWYG rules for your model's loadout. I never really got a chance to get into it, because around that time the US military decided that my weather predicting powers were needed in Japan, and gaming fell apart for me for awhile. By chance, I e-stumbled upon one of the figures from that game that I really liked and it got me thinking. This would be perfect for Malifaux. Large model versions of famous Malifaux archtypes like the Death Marshals, Nephilim, and Showgirls. Rules that trade back and forth model activation for back and forth AP usage. Cool narrative play that would make it a hybrid of Through the Breach and Malifaux. So Wyrd, if you ever want to expand Malifaux out (and don't make a Wyrd version of Mordheim), consider a single mini skirmish game with large, detailed figures.

If you didn't vote for the Bruce Lee card sleeves, then you hate America.

That's what you get for playing WoW. Also, if you would like, I can loan you the book we picked up at GenCon. Just come on by.

RAW, armor would reduce the damage.

Ah, I see it. Thank you.

I've got the book, not the Ten Thunders or Gremlin arsenal decks. Both the Whiskey Golem and the Tri-Chi list dual faction upgrades, but I can't find a rule that allows him to hire Tri-Chi while running as Ten Thunders. Is there one?

I think in a similar situation, with no rules on linking actions to "causes", I would have ruled that the falling damage was separate from Mei Feng's action, making it invalid for the Scheme.

I can just picture Colette saying "Ha Ha Ha, where are we?!"

They blow things up and walk awaaaaaaay.

In my opinion, you're wrong.