Fun times rules talk from over on the Facebook group.
One of the basic movements I've been using for years now (and seen at every tournament for that matter) is that when presented with something like a Ht 3 cliff, a model could opt to climb down the top inch of it to Ht 2, and then begin lateral movement again, effectively falling the remaining 2 inches and taking no damage.
Based on RAW, is there any clean justification for this? The best I could come up with is that climbing is part of moving, so would be subject to the normal movement restrictions that let you change direction while moving. That feels weak though.
Question
Clement
Fun times rules talk from over on the Facebook group.
One of the basic movements I've been using for years now (and seen at every tournament for that matter) is that when presented with something like a Ht 3 cliff, a model could opt to climb down the top inch of it to Ht 2, and then begin lateral movement again, effectively falling the remaining 2 inches and taking no damage.
Based on RAW, is there any clean justification for this? The best I could come up with is that climbing is part of moving, so would be subject to the normal movement restrictions that let you change direction while moving. That feels weak though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.