Jump to content

DocSchlock

Members
  • Content count

    439
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About DocSchlock

  • Rank
    Enforcer
  • Birthday 07/21/1987

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Central PA

Recent Profile Visitors

601 profile views
  1. Wyrd Games Events in Williamsport and Wellsboro, PA

    Oct 2017 update
  2. Wyrd Games Events in Williamsport and Wellsboro, PA

    Sept 2017 update
  3. GUILD - ALT MODEL

    Nightmare Peacekeeper. I want a massive fist of plastic. Lady Pistoleros - a Chronicles had art of them and they need to release. I need to own them. Hoffman in a "Three Kingdoms Robot Drama" nightmare box - aka a mecha box or kitted out as the King's Empire as a TOS crossover (so Weird War 1 models). McMourning Classic Movie Monster Nightmare Box - I'm talking Hammer-era vampires / mummies / wolfmen. It might be a bit too close to him now, but I still think it would be fun. (and he's technically Guild, so it would fall under here).
  4. 10T - ALT MODEL

    David Bowie-esque Lust Alt. My number one want. I'll vote for the Alt Pathfinder too. Use him so often, want to see an alt take. Seeing the Ancestors alive would be neat. Clan-era Izamu, Yin, and Toshiro - but it probably wouldn't that popular of an Alt. A Shenlong box mocked off famous kung-fu flick actors would be neat.
  5. Collect Evidence

    "This Scheme may not start revealed. Reveal this Scheme once this Crew has scored any VP from it. If a friendly model takes a (1) Interact Action and removes 1 or more enemy Scheme Markers, score 1 VP. At the end of the Turn, if this Scheme is revealed and the opponent does not have any Scheme Markers at least 6" outside of their deployment zone, score 1 VP." So you can never score this Scheme if you select it and the enemy never drops scheme markers. The second scoring condition requires the Scheme to be revealed, which requires a VP to be scored from the scheme. First scoring condition requires enemy scheme markers, which aren't guaranteed to show up. That seems difficult and potentially valueless for a suited scheme.
  6. What are these models previewed at Gencon?

    Because TOS' advert drive hasn't really started yet. It's still in production, so it's not time to really start pushing it hard. Probably when TOS releases in Dec / Jan, they'll announce more stuff is coming to encourage players to buy in, seeing how there's already future support coming.
  7. What are these models previewed at Gencon?

    The strange unknown models at the end on TOS bases (the Genie and frog-thing) are probably for the Three Kingdoms and Kimon Oni TOS Allegiances announced during Gencon. The other ones look like Golems. Wyrd may be doing a cycle of Golems for the other factions for the next book.
  8. Official Malifaux app

    Bit of a necro: I have a few players coming from WMH in my area that are extremely frustrated by not having an official app - to the point where it's becoming a detrimental thing (mainly due to errata) turning them off the game. Really hope Wyrd has something to show this fall, even if it's a UX alpha. Encounter generator, full cards, condition & damage tracking are really needed.
  9. August 4th - Fenton Brahms

    @thatlatinspeakingguy Are you saying you're a latin speaking guy?
  10. For sale: Metal Gamin High River Monk 2x Rail Workers $6 each, all full painted and based. Buyer pays shipping. All come with the latest errata cards. Pics!
  11. August 4th - Fenton Brahms

    Law of the Flame sounds nicer. 16 years on from my 1 year of Latin and I have just enough to make a fool of myself.
  12. August 4th - Fenton Brahms

    Contiones de Rege Flammae - Discourse of the Kingly (Royal?) Fire? My Latin is very rusty.
  13. July 2017 Errata

    Errata looks great! 3SS Stuffed Piglets are a fair balance - makes them situational instead of take a bunch to force your opponent into an NPE for dirt cheap. Activation Control as a whole needs visited on in any potential 2.5E core ruleset since it's so unfun in general to play against.
  14. Terror and Conditions caused by enemy models

    I'd call it as 2 - the Mage would ignore the Paralyze Condition. Burning and Poison have their own resolved effects later on (or triggered by other things) and are bad comparisons here. You're conflating a Condition's effects with the moment of application of the Condition. Who put the Burning / Poison on isn't in question in those FAQ rulings - it's does the damage from the burning / poison come from a specific model. For example, if a failed Ability Duel granted Burning, the Mage would ignore the Burning since it was being applied by the Ability of a model. If the Mage has Burning on him somehow, the Protection would never ignore the damage from Burning, since that's an effect from a Condition, not gaining a Condition. Since FAQ rulings are specific and narrow: 80 and 79 are not relevant in this case. 81 is illustrating the effects of a Condition are still the basis of origin for the purposes of Condition kills and damage. If 1 were correct, all duels caused by Abilities / Actions would not longer apply effects that source from the originating model. I think that could possibly cause a lot of rules issues since Attack Actions would no longer be dealing damage that comes from a model, but from the Attack Duel, so "damage from enemy models" would now no longer apply as well, as an example of a rules breakdown. That is how I see it.
  15. Wyrd Games Events in Williamsport and Wellsboro, PA

    August update!
×