Jump to content

magicpockets

Vote Enabled
  • Posts

    2,297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About magicpockets

  • Birthday 11/18/1979

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

magicpockets's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (13/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I really like you Joel, just don't confuse tolerance with ignorance. You acknowledge our relative positions are different, so bear in mind Wyrd releasing a FAQ (once again with numerous issues in it, but that's another conversation) within the first few months of you starting Malifaux doesn't make them "responsive" - it just makes it a "coincidence". You're new to the game, you're enthusiastic, you're competitive and you've bought into the game heart and soul - much like I did when I first started playing 3 or 4 years ago. But don't let that blinker you to objective reality, that way lies fanboyism *wink* And for the record, it's more than three players who've shelved their fate decks. For example (in terms of people you know) aka_hazard who you met at the tournament in Cranfield is also on a very long "break" from the game - again because of Wyrd's inability to sort the rules out. And that's just one example. ---------- Post added at 09:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 PM ---------- FOR F**KS SAKE!!!! Why does everyone immediately put winning with Hamelin down to his crew being broken and the player devoid of skill? This is a prime example of the problem Wyrd have created. Two things I've noticed. There are a lot of people coming out of the woodwork who've quit or are quitting the game, and the biggest defenders of Malifaux and the system are people who are new to the game (the old guard so to speak seem to be quite "understanding" of the points we're raising). Ignorance is bliss yo...
  2. I think the fact we have very few (if any) cheering fanboys over here any more, even some of the people most supportive of Wyrd in the past have commented publicly or privately about their dissatisfaction with the game now (I'll leave the private ones to chip in themselves - you know who you are *wink*). There seems to be a much stronger "we love Wyrd" contingent across the pond, and let's not forget despite the UK's apparent position in the world, you have more people in California that we have in our entire country - so a simultaneous exodus form what is actually a small community will appear disproportionally "big". Plus, there is of course a cultural difference between the UK and the USA in how we approach/tolerate things - we see the world through different perspectives (and I'm not saying one is better than the other as I LOVE certain aspects of the American outlook - just pointing something out we often overlook this day in age)
  3. Pretty much sums up my view, but a lot politer than I would have put it. I think Wyrd have really dropped the ball putting $$$ before the game and it's players. For my 2p worth, I'm retiring for an unspecified time although (like Ian I presume) I will dust of the minis for the odd tournament just for the social side. Hell, if it wasn't for the people involved in the Malifaux scene I think this would have come a lot sooner. Not sure on Ian's source but I know our LGS (bearing in mind we're one of the largest local Malifaux communities behind Harrogate afaik) has stopped stocking it because (rough quote) "there are no new players. Every game gets a burst of new players and then stagnantes with the core carrying it on. Malifaux is over" I still see new players, but I find I'm missing a lot more old players on here and at events.
  4. Does that mean everyone effectively now has scout?
  5. Am certainly not evil And like I said, it was a GT so all bets were off. I'd never pull that in a friendly game (unless it was against UKRocky cos he deserves it)
  6. I do, but Wyrd wrote the rules as well as the fluff. If they don't match in your opinion you should be taking that up with Wyrd, not complaining about ME when I do something in a tournament which is perfectly legit. Sorry if that seems ranty but I don't think it's fair to criticize me for playing fairly *wink*
  7. Or play on Terraclips which (despite having doors which are ingeniously too small for bases to fit through) have 1" markings on them. A little bit of trigonometry goes a LONG way then
  8. Strongly disagree with this, that's half of the point of Malifaux. If I want to sacrifice my 10ss model to avoid you getting 2vp and play with a handicap that should be my decision. Also, me doing that to you is the risk you take for announcing the scheme for the extra VP - don't want the risk, you only get 1vp my friend.
  9. ^^ In that case you would, didn't know the wording was that precise
  10. Giant killer teddies, children with carving knives, undead hookers.... and you want to label a master killing themselves to avoid a scheme "silly"? Welcome to Malifaux sir, take a seat - it's going to be a bumpy ride ---------- Post added at 10:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:23 AM ---------- Nothing a few beers can't solve *wink*
  11. Any rat within 4" of an activating rat (not just the initial activating rat) has to activate at the same time a la companion. It's very rare you get more than one or two groups of rats activating
  12. ^^ You're preaching to the choir with that mate
  13. Because Voracious Rats says no models can be summoned other than rats, you don't need to get a rat for it to come into effect
  14. ^^ Exactly. And as for the "impossibility" of schemes like Kill Protegee (mentioned above), can I just remind you you don't have to announce them. If you want the extra VP, you run the risk of someone making it impossible for you - that's why you get an extra VP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information